Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 00:07:31 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [Ux2bs_Archive] No. 382 ************************************************** Thursday 06 January 2005 Number 382 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: test : John Poltorak 2 Re: UX2BS list : T.Sikora" 3 Install/build problems? : John Poltorak 4 RE: [UX2BS] OPENSSL : PATRICK ASH " 1 Re: [UX2BS] OPENSSL : John Poltorak 2 Re: [UX2BS] OPENSSL : Johannes Hromadka 5 Re: [UX2BS] OPENSSL : John Poltorak **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:48:17 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: test On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:43:12PM +0200, spider wrote: > test It worked yesterday - but nothing today so far... _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 10:54:18 -0500 From: "T.Sikora" Subject: Re: UX2BS list John Poltorak wrote: > Hi Ted, > > Is there any problem with the UX2BS list? Yes and no. I turned sendmail off because some jerk keeps trying to hack it and mailman. He was eating up my bandwidth with his scripts. I'll turn it back on. > > BTW, Happy New Year. Same here, everyone else too. > > Cheers > > John > > -- T.Sikora tsikora at ntplx dot net _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:16:25 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Install/build problems? Is anyone having any UX2BS installation or build problems? IMV the installation finishes once ux2_inst.cmd has completed. At the moment there are still a few outstanding issues where certain apps are getting built but not installed. I hope to get that sorted out in the next few days. I still need to find a way of establishing if a build has been successful. Does anyone have any ideas? -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: TUE, 04 JAN 2005 20:16:10 +0000 From: "PATRICK ASH " Subject: RE: [UX2BS] OPENSSL I RECENTLY BUILT 0.9.7E USING GCC 3.0.3. I RAN INTO PROBLEMS WITH UNRESOLVED EXTERNALS STRCASECMP AND STRNCASECMP. EVEN THOUGH BOTH ARE REDEFINED IN STRING.H, THE BUILD PROCESS FAILED TO MAKE THIS SUBSTITUTION. I ENDED UP DOING A GLOBAL REPLACE OF EACH WITH IT'S APPROPRIATE REDEFINITION. AS I RECALL, THIS PROBLEM ALSO OCCURRED IN 0.9.7D, BUT NOT IN 0.9.7C. PAT ON TUE, 4 JAN 2005 19:55:39 +0000, JOHN POLTORAK WROTE: >I'D BE INTERESTED TO KNOW IF ANYONE CAN GET THIS VERSION BUILT OR IDENTIFY >WHAT IS CAUSING THE BUILD TO FAIL. > > -- PATRICK ASH PATASH at COMCAST.NET THERE ARE ONLY 10 KINDS OF PEOPLE IN THE WORLD -- THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND BINARY AND THOSE WHO DON'T. This OS/2 system uptime is 0 days, 23:03 hours and 40 seconds _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:51:06 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: [UX2BS] OPENSSL On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:16:10PM +0000, PATRICK ASH wrote: > I RECENTLY BUILT 0.9.7E USING GCC 3.0.3. I RAN INTO PROBLEMS WITH > UNRESOLVED EXTERNALS STRCASECMP AND STRNCASECMP. EVEN THOUGH BOTH ARE > REDEFINED IN STRING.H, THE BUILD PROCESS FAILED TO MAKE THIS > SUBSTITUTION. I ENDED UP DOING A GLOBAL REPLACE OF EACH WITH IT'S > APPROPRIATE REDEFINITION. AS I RECALL, THIS PROBLEM ALSO OCCURRED IN > 0.9.7D, BUT NOT IN 0.9.7C. > > PAT > > ON TUE, 4 JAN 2005 19:55:39 +0000, JOHN POLTORAK WROTE: > > >I'D BE INTERESTED TO KNOW IF ANYONE CAN GET THIS VERSION BUILT OR IDENTIFY > >WHAT IS CAUSING THE BUILD TO FAIL. I'll give v0.9.7c a try with UX2BS and see if that works. I'm sure it did at one time... > > -- > PATRICK ASH > PATASH at COMCAST.NET > > THERE ARE ONLY 10 KINDS OF PEOPLE IN THE WORLD -- > THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND BINARY AND THOSE WHO DON'T. > > This OS/2 system uptime is 0 days, 23:03 hours and 40 seconds -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:31:03 +0100 From: Johannes Hromadka Subject: Re: [UX2BS] OPENSSL This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============37769648850229154== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD478D6D28E6F0C367EB1B820" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD478D6D28E6F0C367EB1B820 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit PATRICK ASH wrote: > I RECENTLY BUILT 0.9.7E USING GCC 3.0.3. I RAN INTO PROBLEMS WITH > UNRESOLVED EXTERNALS STRCASECMP AND STRNCASECMP. EVEN THOUGH BOTH ARE > REDEFINED IN STRING.H, THE BUILD PROCESS FAILED TO MAKE THIS > SUBSTITUTION. I ENDED UP DOING A GLOBAL REPLACE OF EACH WITH IT'S > APPROPRIATE REDEFINITION. AS I RECALL, THIS PROBLEM ALSO OCCURRED IN > 0.9.7D, BUT NOT IN 0.9.7C. > There was a new file in directory crypto called o_str.c introduced in 0.9.7d This undefines the strcasecmp and strncasecmp #undef strncasecmp #undef strcasecmp I added this 4 lines and could compile it. #if defined(OPENSSL_SYS_OS2) && defined(__EMX__) # define strcasecmp stricmp # define strncasecmp strnicmp #endif Hannes --------------enigD478D6D28E6F0C367EB1B820 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (OS/2) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB3E6M4DqFEwSHQSwRApXqAJ9Boxop4epNAmzIuU4C9qCxmx+kiwCePfR2 K9qe+xi5U6ZyiSBoXKrYdNk= =5+cJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD478D6D28E6F0C367EB1B820-- --===============37769648850229154== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs --===============37769648850229154==-- **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 19:15:50 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: [UX2BS] OPENSSL On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 04:51:06PM +0000, John Poltorak wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:16:10PM +0000, PATRICK ASH wrote: > > I RECENTLY BUILT 0.9.7E USING GCC 3.0.3. I RAN INTO PROBLEMS WITH > > UNRESOLVED EXTERNALS STRCASECMP AND STRNCASECMP. EVEN THOUGH BOTH ARE > > REDEFINED IN STRING.H, THE BUILD PROCESS FAILED TO MAKE THIS > > SUBSTITUTION. I ENDED UP DOING A GLOBAL REPLACE OF EACH WITH IT'S > > APPROPRIATE REDEFINITION. AS I RECALL, THIS PROBLEM ALSO OCCURRED IN > > 0.9.7D, BUT NOT IN 0.9.7C. > > > > PAT > > > > ON TUE, 4 JAN 2005 19:55:39 +0000, JOHN POLTORAK WROTE: > > > > >I'D BE INTERESTED TO KNOW IF ANYONE CAN GET THIS VERSION BUILT OR IDENTIFY > > >WHAT IS CAUSING THE BUILD TO FAIL. > > I'll give v0.9.7c a try with UX2BS and see if that works. I'm sure it did > at one time... I've just tried v0.9.7c and that works so build.table has now been updated to pull in the newer version. > > > > > -- > > PATRICK ASH > > PATASH at COMCAST.NET > > > > THERE ARE ONLY 10 KINDS OF PEOPLE IN THE WORLD -- > > THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND BINARY AND THOSE WHO DON'T. > > > > This OS/2 system uptime is 0 days, 23:03 hours and 40 seconds -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs