Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 00:07:05 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [Ux2bs_Archive] No. 291 ************************************************** Tuesday 23 March 2004 Number 291 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Any success? : Dave and Natalie" 2 bad Perl results : Sebastian Wittmeier" 1 Re: bad Perl results : John Poltorak **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:03:56 -0800 From: "Dave and Natalie" Subject: Re: Any success? On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:32:59 +0100, Frank Gieáler wrote: >Dave and Natalie wrote: >> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:33:29 +0100, Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>>>Both Blackbox and Fluxbox need a newer GCC then 2.8.1. >>> >>>Since XFree86 itself is build with gcc 3.0.3, it's probably best to >>>use that same version for applications as well, so lacking C++ support >>>in 2.8.1 shouldn't be much of a problem any longer. >> >> >> The problem is 3.0.3 seems to be overly buggy. Building Fluxbox with 3..0.3 I get my popup.log filled with these >> 03-15-2004 21:51:24 SYS3175 PID bec4 TID 0001 Slot 010a >> E:\EMX\BIN.GCC303\GCC.EXE >> c0000005 > >I've been listening to this for some time now. Gcc303 builds XFree >without a problem and without a single popup. And there are C++ sources >as well. I very much doubt that this gcc version is as much buggy as you >think. I strongly suggest that you check your gcc installation/setup! > >> With similar ones in cpp.exe and g++.exe. This is just in the configure run. Make fails in the first source file. > >Maybe you should start with a simple "hello world" then? > >Frank. > Well I've found an iconv.dll conflict which has overflowed into intl.dll. I'm going to try starting out afresh with Johns enviroment as the foundation. Do you have 3.0.3 installed in \emx\bin as a 2.8.1 replacement or in \emx\bin\bin.new? Dave _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:02:28 +0100 (CET) From: "Sebastian Wittmeier" Subject: bad Perl results Hi, I reinstalled UX2bs on another machine and had many failures: Failed 27/726 test scripts, 96.28% okay. 389/68742 subtests failed, 99.43% okay. Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- .../ext/B/t/debug.t 3 1 33.33% 3 .../ext/B/t/deparse.t 17 1 5.88% 17 .../ext/B/t/lint.t 13 13 100.00% 1-13 .../ext/B/t/o.t 9 7 77.78% 2-5 7-9 .../ext/Devel/DProf/DProf.t 18 17 94.44% 1-10 12-18 .../ext/Filter/t/call.t 28 14 50.00% 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 .../lib/ExtUtils/t/basic.t 1 256 17 1 5.88% 14 .../lib/IPC/Open3.t 22 6 27.27% 4 10-13 15 .../lib/h2xs.t 7 1792 113 7 6.19% 3-4 23 42 61 80 95 .../lib/strict.t 97 97 100.00% 1-97 .../lib/subs.t 9 9 100.00% 1-9 .../lib/utf8.t 94 15 15.96% 16-30 .../lib/warnings.t 478 4 0.84% 212 223 277 281 io/argv.t 22 1 4.55% 22 lib/os2_base.t 1 256 19 1 5.26% 8 lib/os2_ea.t 21 8 38.10% 7-11 14-16 lib/os2_process.t 5 1280 227 5 2.20% 80 85 94 174 209 lib/os2_process_kid.t 227 5 2.20% 80 85 94 174 209 lib/rx_cmprt.t 255 65280 18 3 16.67% 16-18 op/anonsub.t 5 5 100.00% 1-5 op/fork.t 18 18 100.00% 1-18 op/grent.t 3 1 33.33% 2 op/pwent.t 2 1 50.00% 1 op/runlevel.t 21 21 100.00% 1-21 op/tie.t 21 20 95.24% 1-15 17-21 run/fresh_perl.t 97 97 100.00% 1-97 run/runenv.t 11 11 100.00% 1-11 55 tests and 557 subtests skipped. I will sort them out the next days. It is Perl 5.8.0., it should work better! Sebastian _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:12:26 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: bad Perl results On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 12:02:28PM +0100, Sebastian Wittmeier wrote: > Hi, > I reinstalled UX2bs on another machine and had many failures: How did you install it? > Failed 27/726 test scripts, 96.28% okay. 389/68742 subtests failed, > I will sort them out the next days. > It is Perl 5.8.0., it should work better! Did you mean to build 5.8.0? The current UX2BS builds 5.8.3, although there is an available patch which I ought to include. > Sebastian -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs