Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:07:06 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [Ux2bs_Archive] No. 290 ************************************************** Monday 22 March 2004 Number 290 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Installation behind proxy : John Poltorak 2 Re: Any success? : =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Frank_Gie=DFler?= **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:25:48 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Installation behind proxy On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 05:09:44PM +0200, J. Ulbts wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 18:46:33 +0000, John Poltorak wrote: > > [WGET and proxy] > >> If .wgetrc is set up correctly: no one. > >> My .wgetrc looks like: > >> > >> passive_ftp = on > >> http_proxy = http://proxy.uni-erlangen.de:80 > >> ftp_proxy = http://proxy.uni-erlangen.de:80 > > > >Can all this be specified on the command line rather than in .wgetrc? > > Why not ask a question "Do you use a proxy?", when someone installes UX2BS and create the file for the > Let the user enter his proxy server. > It would be a good idea to make this little script also working as standalone version, to change the setting. > So you don't have to edit the .wgetrc file by hand. > > ===WGETSETUP.CMD=== > [...] > ECHO passive_ftp = on > .wgetrc > ECHO http_proxy = ... >>.wgetrc > [...] > = > or maybe even better with REXX! What I think I will do is create a /etc/.wgetrc with the three options above and add the line:- set WGETRC=%ETC%\.wgetrc to the optional file ux2_local.cmd for those that are behind a firewall. Unfortunately when I test this, WGET appears to retrieve files correctly but return a different response code which cause the build script to fail and stop with the error msg 'retrieval failed'. I've never fully got a handle on WGET response codes and would be interested to know whether anyone else sees the same error, or is it just some error which I have introduced? > Kind Regards, > Juergen Ulbts (Germany) -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 09:32:59 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Frank_Gie=DFler?= Subject: Re: Any success? Dave and Natalie wrote: > On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 15:33:29 +0100, Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> >>>Both Blackbox and Fluxbox need a newer GCC then 2.8.1. >> >>Since XFree86 itself is build with gcc 3.0.3, it's probably best to >>use that same version for applications as well, so lacking C++ support >>in 2.8.1 shouldn't be much of a problem any longer. > > > The problem is 3.0.3 seems to be overly buggy. Building Fluxbox with 3.0.3 I get my popup.log filled with these > 03-15-2004 21:51:24 SYS3175 PID bec4 TID 0001 Slot 010a > E:\EMX\BIN.GCC303\GCC.EXE > c0000005 I've been listening to this for some time now. Gcc303 builds XFree without a problem and without a single popup. And there are C++ sources as well. I very much doubt that this gcc version is as much buggy as you think. I strongly suggest that you check your gcc installation/setup! > With similar ones in cpp.exe and g++.exe. This is just in the configure run. Make fails in the first source file. Maybe you should start with a simple "hello world" then? Frank. -- Frank Giessler Klinikum der Universitaet Jena Tel.: +49-3641-9 32 57 80 Biomagnetisches Zentrum Fax : +49-3641-9 32 57 72 _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs