Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 02:56:26 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [Ux2bs_Archive] No. 246 ************************************************** Sunday 07 December 2003 Number 246 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: UX2BS : Dave Saville" 2 Re: UX2BS : John Poltorak 3 Re: building a2ps : J. Ulbts" 4 Re: building a2ps : John Poltorak **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 19:46:52 +0000 (GMT) From: "Dave Saville" Subject: Re: UX2BS On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:40:43 +0000, John Poltorak wrote: >On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:41:51AM -0800, Dave and Natalie wrote: > >> >> Well I tried again from scratch (with most archives already downloaded) and evrything went pretty smooth. >> > >> >That's great. >> > >> >Any chance of you posting the Perl test summary from near the end of >> >perl.log? >> >> Failed 7/726 test scripts, 99.04% okay. 19/68706 subtests failed, 99.97% okay. >> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ../lib/ExtUtils/t/basic.t 1 256 17 1 5.88% 14 >> lib/os2_base.t 1 256 19 1 5.26% 8 >> lib/os2_process.t 7 1792 227 7 3.08% 2 10 19 34 100 174 209 >> lib/os2_process_kid.t 227 4 1.76% 10 34 174 209 >> lib/rx_cmprt.t 255 65280 18 3 16.67% 16-18 > >Those look like the usual suspects... > > >> op/alarm.t 4 2 50.00% 1-2 > >but this... looks like a new one. > > >> op/stat.t 73 1 1.37% 44 >> 60 tests and 563 subtests skipped. > >It would be nice to find the definitive number of tests skipped at some >point, but not just yet. Would be nice if we could get this output from Ilya's "official" OS/2 version ;-) -- Regards Dave Saville _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:42:25 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: UX2BS On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 07:46:52PM +0000, Dave Saville wrote: > On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:40:43 +0000, John Poltorak wrote: > > >On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:41:51AM -0800, Dave and Natalie wrote: > > > >> >> Well I tried again from scratch (with most archives already downloaded) and evrything went pretty smooth. > >> > > >> >That's great. > >> > > >> >Any chance of you posting the Perl test summary from near the end of > >> >perl.log? > >> > >> Failed 7/726 test scripts, 99.04% okay. 19/68706 subtests failed, 99.97% okay. > >> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> ../lib/ExtUtils/t/basic.t 1 256 17 1 5.88% 14 > >> lib/os2_base.t 1 256 19 1 5.26% 8 > >> lib/os2_process.t 7 1792 227 7 3.08% 2 10 19 34 100 174 209 > >> lib/os2_process_kid.t 227 4 1.76% 10 34 174 209 > >> lib/rx_cmprt.t 255 65280 18 3 16.67% 16-18 > > > >Those look like the usual suspects... > > > > > >> op/alarm.t 4 2 50.00% 1-2 > > > >but this... looks like a new one. > > > > > >> op/stat.t 73 1 1.37% 44 > >> 60 tests and 563 subtests skipped. > > > >It would be nice to find the definitive number of tests skipped at some > >point, but not just yet. > > Would be nice if we could get this output from Ilya's "official" OS/2 > version ;-) Why? What do you get from his version? This simply a build of his port, so I don't see why it would differ... > -- > Regards > > Dave Saville -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 23:02:02 +0100 (CET) From: "J. Ulbts" Subject: Re: building a2ps Hi! On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 17:44:38 +0100, Michael Zolk wrote: >On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:31:44PM +0000, John Poltorak wrote: >> > For some reason wget fails to download the source archives. [...] >> What happens when you run wget at the command line? > >OK, I found out what went wrong: > >The archives have in fact been downloaded properly, however wget does not >seem to return the appropriate return code, so build.sh aborts with the >"retrieval failed" message. > >Simply typing "build pdksh" again results in a nice sh.exe :) This is exactly the same problem I've got here, as reported before. I don't know how to fix it. I also tried to add "--passive-ftp" but it didn't help. Maybe it's a good idea to set the tries to 2 instead of 1 (wget sees it's already there and it'll work). Have not tried this so far. I've got ISDNPM 3.x building the Internet connection...it's installed on a eCS server. Kind Regards, Juergen Ulbts (Germany) _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 23:08:56 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: building a2ps On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:02:02PM +0100, J. Ulbts wrote: > Hi! > > On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 17:44:38 +0100, Michael Zolk wrote: > > >On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:31:44PM +0000, John Poltorak wrote: > >> > For some reason wget fails to download the source archives. > [...] > >> What happens when you run wget at the command line? > > > >OK, I found out what went wrong: > > > >The archives have in fact been downloaded properly, however wget does not > >seem to return the appropriate return code, so build.sh aborts with the > >"retrieval failed" message. > > > >Simply typing "build pdksh" again results in a nice sh.exe :) > > This is exactly the same problem I've got here, as reported before. > I don't know how to fix it. I also tried to add "--passive-ftp" but it didn't help. > Maybe it's a good idea to set the tries to 2 instead of 1 (wget sees it's already there and it'll work). > Have not tried this so far. Remove the '-q' flag from the WGET line and see what happens. Does running WGET from the cmd line usually work? I guess this needs to get sorted out but no one knows what the problem is, and WGET's return codes can be sufficently misleading to be be incorrectly interpreted. > Kind Regards, > Juergen Ulbts (Germany) -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs