Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 02:54:37 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [Ux2bs_Archive] No. 223 ************************************************** Saturday 08 November 2003 Number 223 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Any configure experts? : John Poltorak 2 Re: Any configure experts? : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 12:10:32 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Any configure experts? If we have any configure experts could you have a look at the way PDKSH is built? It uses a configure.cmd in the OS/2 directory and it looks like a real kludge. I was wondering if, with recent improvements to autoconf, it could be built in the standard Unix way without the need to have all those bits and pieces we used to need to get round problems... -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 17:32:36 +0100 From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: Re: Any configure experts? Hi, > It uses a configure.cmd in the OS/2 directory and it looks like a real > kludge. I was wondering if, with recent improvements to autoconf, it could > be built in the standard Unix way without the need to have all those bits > and pieces we used to need to get round problems... I didn't look at it, but I suppose, you'd have to "rewrite" configure.in first to support said newer version of autoconf... :-( Regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs