Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 02:54:32 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [Ux2bs_Archive] No. 220 ************************************************** Saturday 01 November 2003 Number 220 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: UX2BS : Dave and Natalie" 2 Re: UX2BS : James Moe" 3 Re: UX2BS : Dave and Natalie" **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 16:40:18 -0800 From: "Dave and Natalie" Subject: Re: UX2BS On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 17:42:22 +0000, John Poltorak wrote: >> Ok, all these did build. Question, shouldn't unzip be built with >> OS2_EAS and USE_UNSHRINK (which I believe the patent recently >> expired).IIRC IBM uses unshrink in some archives. > >I'm not sure what the correct settings are for UNZIP, I just used the >defaults. If you think some others are more appropriate then I'll change >them. What exactly would you suggest as the right options for building it? >How should your suggestions be implemented? just do SET LOCAL_UNZIP=-DOS2_EAS -DUSE_UNSHRINK before building > >> >> GNURX.DLL 0001:000009e2 >> > >> >Just wondered if you have a different GNURX.DLL which has crept in >> >somewhere... This one should be 37672 bytes from 20/05/95 in \unixos2\dll. >> >> Yes, sorry for not debugging but the script ended after midnight and I >> had to get up to work. This morning I just quickly wrote the email and >> left for work. >> I have >> gnurx.dll 40469 02-08-96 5:34p >> in e:/emx/dll. No idea where I got this > >It may be from a newer version of SED, but I thought it would have been >ignored by the BEGINLIBPATH setting... Maybe it was already in memory for >some reason. No, I even tried setting LIBPATHSTRICT=T and it still picked up gnurx.dll. Sed didn't come with it. snip > >Have you set UXRT and BLDRT to different drives? > >I haven't tested that myself No, both UXRT and BLDRT are set to G: > > >> After perl I get this error >> gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file >> tar: "gzip" exit status 1 >> The archive make-3.76.1.tar.gz does not appear to have extracted >> correctly >> so the build of make-3.76.1 is unable to continue. >> Press any key to EXIT >> make-3.76.1.tar.gz is only 6500 bytes so I guess the download failed. >> Should be using wget. >> >> Then similar problems with autoconf-2.50.tar.gz. Shouldn't we be using >> ver 2.57? > >UX2BS uses three different versions of Autoconf. Some versions work better >with some apps than others! > >> Then automake is not even there so the script dies. >> >> Sorry I don't have more time right now to debug but I've been busy > >Since there seem to be some problems with the Perl build, it may be better >to delete everything and start from sratch, making sure that all your >archives are in a safe place so you don't need to download everything >again. Ok, will report later Dave _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 18:04:23 -0700 From: "James Moe" Subject: Re: UX2BS On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 16:40:18 -0800 "Dave and Natalie" >>> I have >>> gnurx.dll 40469 02-08-96 5:34p >>> in e:/emx/dll. No idea where I got this >> >>It may be from a newer version of SED, but I thought it would have been >>ignored by the BEGINLIBPATH setting... Maybe it was already in memory for >>some reason. > >No, I even tried setting LIBPATHSTRICT=T and it still picked up >gnurx.dll. Sed didn't come with it. > It's probably the only one on your system. After exhausting beginlibpath it moves on to libpath. Have you tried renaming it to see what happens? -- jimoe at sohnen-moe dot com _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 19:09:22 -0800 From: "Dave and Natalie" Subject: Re: UX2BS On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 18:04:23 -0700, James Moe wrote: >On Sun, 02 Nov 2003 16:40:18 -0800 "Dave and Natalie" >>> I have >>>> gnurx.dll 40469 02-08-96 5:34p >>>> in e:/emx/dll. No idea where I got this >>> >>>It may be from a newer version of SED, but I thought it would have been >>>ignored by the BEGINLIBPATH setting... Maybe it was already in memory for >>>some reason. >> >>No, I even tried setting LIBPATHSTRICT=T and it still picked up >>gnurx.dll. Sed didn't come with it. >> > It's probably the only one on your system. After exhausting >beginlibpath it moves on to libpath. > Have you tried renaming it to see what happens? Well there was another gnurx.dll in g:/unixos2/dll which I presumed Johns script set beginlibpath but I set it to g:/unixos2/dll just in case. Still the one on E: was found. Anyways I renamed it and Johns script works much better without it and nothing has complained yet. Dave _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs