Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 02:51:44 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [Ux2bs_Archive] No. 217 ************************************************** Wednesday 29 October 2003 Number 217 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: libcurses and/or libncurses and ux2bs status : J. Ulbts" 2 Re: PASSWD : Bart van Leeuwen" **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 01:44:08 +0100 (CET) From: "J. Ulbts" Subject: Re: libcurses and/or libncurses and ux2bs status Hello John! Many thanks for your answer. On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:35:38 +0000, John Poltorak wrote: >As it stands now, UX2BS provides a standard development environment in >which a good number of apps can be built from source using a standard >'build' command. Ok, I'll try the current version and see how far I get. >GCC 3.2.2 is not included at present, but it would be nice to add it at >some point. I hope so. :) >As far as NCURSES goes, it should get built for you as part of the initial >install process. I thought libcurses or libncurses is not equal to ncurses. I think I'll know more if I look deeper into the source of Kismet, the reason behind this question. http://www.kismetwireless.net/ Kind Regards, Juergen Ulbts (Germany) _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:59:56 +0100 From: "Bart van Leeuwen" Subject: Re: PASSWD My question regarding this is mainly if there is a standard API on linux to acces information like this, then it would be rather easy to create a interface on security/2 accessing and modifying the passwd file directly doesn't seem like a good idea to me. please post some comments on this. With Regards Bart van Leeuwen _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs