Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 02:51:16 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600
Subject: [Ux2bs_Archive] No. 208

**************************************************
Wednesday 01 October 2003
 Number  208
**************************************************

Subjects for today
 
1   OpenSSH : Adrian Gschwend" <ktk at datacomm.ch>
2  Re:  OpenSSH : Alex Samorukov <samm at os2.ru>
3   Re: [XFreeOS2] Changes in building apps with Imake? : T.Sikora" <tsikora at ntplx.net>
4   [Fwd: Re: [XFreeOS2] Changes in building apps with Imake?] : T.Sikora" <tsikora at ntplx.net>
5   Weird problem : T.Sikora" <tsikora at ntplx.net>
6   true.cmd : T.Sikora" <tsikora at ntplx.net>
7  Re:  true.cmd : T.Sikora" <tsikora at ntplx.net>
8  Re:  Re: [XFreeOS2] Changes in building apps with Imake? : John Poltorak <jp at warpix.org>
9  Re:  true.cmd : John Poltorak <jp at warpix.org>

**= Email   1 ==========================**

Date:  Thu, 02 Oct 2003 00:34:40 +0200 (CEST)
From:  "Adrian Gschwend" <ktk at datacomm.ch>
Subject:   OpenSSH

Hi all,

Anyone ever tried to build OpenSSH with ux2bs? The package format of
the openssh zip file sucks, I would like to see it compile right out of
the box in ux2bs :)

cu

Adrian


-- 
Adrian Gschwend
 at  netlabs.org

ktk [a t] netlabs.org
-------
Free Software for OS/2 and eCS
http://www.netlabs.org

_______________________________________________
UX2BS mailing list
UX2BS at os2ports.com
http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs
**= Email   2 ==========================**

Date:  Thu, 02 Oct 2003 08:13:04 +0300
From:  Alex Samorukov <samm at os2.ru>
Subject:  Re:  OpenSSH

Adrian Gschwend wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>Anyone ever tried to build OpenSSH with ux2bs? The package format of
>the openssh zip file sucks, I would like to see it compile right out of
>the box in ux2bs :)
>
You can contact an author  at  os2.kiev.ua website. AFAIK OpenSSH/2 include 
SSES related code, so including it in ux2bs will be a small problem

>
>  
>
_______________________________________________
UX2BS mailing list
UX2BS at os2ports.com
http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs
**= Email   3 ==========================**

Date:  Thu, 02 Oct 2003 09:00:55 -0400
From:  "T.Sikora" <tsikora at ntplx.net>
Subject:   Re: [XFreeOS2] Changes in building apps with Imake?

Frank Giessler wrote:
> Zitat von Holger Veit <holger.veit at ais.fhg.de>:
> 
> 
>>On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:19:54PM +0200, Thomas Hoffmann wrote:
>>
>>>2) transferring Xfree/2 to a unixish location /usr/....
>>
>>This should be already supported now.
> 
> 
> Any objections if I make the next version reside under /usr/X11R6 instead of
> /XFree86 ?
> 
> Frank.
> 
Your going to make a whole lot of people happy especially the ux2 guys.

-- 
T.Sikora
tsikora at ntplx dot net


_______________________________________________
UX2BS mailing list
UX2BS at os2ports.com
http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs
**= Email   4 ==========================**

Date:  Thu, 02 Oct 2003 11:06:48 -0400
From:  "T.Sikora" <tsikora at ntplx.net>
Subject:   [Fwd: Re: [XFreeOS2] Changes in building apps with Imake?]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040007000708000602010102
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I guess many of those old ports will have to stay in \XFree86. Here's 
what Holger said:

-- 
T.Sikora
tsikora at ntplx dot net


--------------040007000708000602010102
Content-Type: message/rfc822;
	name="Re: [XFreeOS2] Changes in building apps with Imake?"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
	filename="Re: [XFreeOS2] Changes in building apps with Imake?"

Received: from ct-mail.citytraffic.de (ct-mail.citytraffic.de [193.175.164.34])
	by mail.ntplx.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id h927cDl3013271
	for <tsikora at ntplx.net>; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 03:38:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ct-mail.citytraffic.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ct-mail.citytraffic.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with
	ESMTP id h927e1A06008; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:40:01 +0200
Received: (from veit at localhost)
	by ct-mail.citytraffic.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id
	h927bIR05908
	for xfreeos2 at citytraffic.de; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:37:18 +0200
From: Holger Veit <holger.veit at ais.fhg.de>
To: xfreeos2 at citytraffic.de
Subject: Re: [XFreeOS2] Changes in building apps with Imake?
Message-ID: <20031002093718.A5854 at ct-mail.citytraffic.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Holger Veit <holger.veit at ais.fhg.de>, xfreeos2 at citytraffic.de
References: <3F79D46C.3010200 at zappa.sax.de>
	<20031001123147.A21516 at ct-mail.citytraffic.de>
	<1065005269.3f7ab0d566bff at www> <1065020052.3f7aea945f36f at www>
	<3F7B28DA.3020405 at zappa.sax.de>
	<20031001225323.A29964 at ct-mail.citytraffic.de>
	<1065077917.3f7bcc9d1ce80 at www>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.16i
In-Reply-To: <1065077917.3f7bcc9d1ce80 at www>;
	from giessler at biomag.uni-jena.de on Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at
	08:58:37AM +0200
Sender: xfreeos2-admin at citytraffic.de
Errors-To: xfreeos2-admin at citytraffic.de
X-BeenThere: xfreeos2 at xfreeos2.dyndns.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: xfreeos2 at citytraffic.de
List-Help: <mailto:xfreeos2-request at xfreeos2.dyndns.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:xfreeos2 at xfreeos2.dyndns.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://ct-mail.citytraffic.de/mailman/listinfo/xfreeos2>,
	<mailto:xfreeos2-request at xfreeos2.dyndns.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: This is the discussion list for the XFree86/OS2 system
	<xfreeos2.xfreeos2.dyndns.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://ct-mail.citytraffic.de/mailman/listinfo/xfreeos2>,
	<mailto:xfreeos2-request at xfreeos2.dyndns.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ct-mail.citytraffic.de/pipermail/xfreeos2/>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:37:18 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and CyberSoft VFind (mail.ntplx.net)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=10.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,
	QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 08:58:37AM +0200, Frank Giessler wrote:
> Zitat von Holger Veit <holger.veit at ais.fhg.de>:
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:19:54PM +0200, Thomas Hoffmann wrote:
> > > 2) transferring Xfree/2 to a unixish location /usr/....
> > 
> > This should be already supported now.
> 
> Any objections if I make the next version reside under /usr/X11R6 instead of
> /XFree86 ?

>From me, no objections. Effectively, this makes the whole system more
consistent with the Unix versions (including new ports from the Unix world).
For old apps, one might still need the old /XFree86 hierarchy, though,
at least for the lib/X11 directories. All other things (PATH, LIBPATH,
font paths, application defaults, NLS paths) are rather unctitical.

Holger

_______________________________________________
Xfreeos2 mailing list
Xfreeos2 at xfreeos2.dyndns.org
http://ct-mail.citytraffic.de/mailman/listinfo/xfreeos2


--------------040007000708000602010102
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
UX2BS mailing list
UX2BS at os2ports.com
http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs

--------------040007000708000602010102--

**= Email   5 ==========================**

Date:  Thu, 02 Oct 2003 11:17:39 -0400
From:  "T.Sikora" <tsikora at ntplx.net>
Subject:   Weird problem

If the ux2bs is installed on the same drive as %osrt% Perl breaks with a 
'cat cannot be found anywhere' error. On a seperate partition 
everythings perfect. Anyone know what may be causing this? This is 
definitely strange. It really should not be installed there but some 
folks may have no choice.

-- 
T.Sikora
tsikora at ntplx dot net


_______________________________________________
UX2BS mailing list
UX2BS at os2ports.com
http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs
**= Email   6 ==========================**

Date:  Thu, 02 Oct 2003 11:36:59 -0400
From:  "T.Sikora" <tsikora at ntplx.net>
Subject:   true.cmd

John what was true/false.cmd for? I left them in because I had no idea 
what depended on it but maybe true.cmd is interfering with true.exe.

-- 
T.Sikora
tsikora at ntplx dot net


_______________________________________________
UX2BS mailing list
UX2BS at os2ports.com
http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs
**= Email   7 ==========================**

Date:  Thu, 02 Oct 2003 12:43:22 -0400
From:  "T.Sikora" <tsikora at ntplx.net>
Subject:  Re:  true.cmd

John Poltorak wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:36:59AM -0400, T.Sikora wrote:
> 
>>John what was true/false.cmd for? I left them in because I had no idea 
>>what depended on it but maybe true.cmd is interfering with true.exe.
> 
> 
> true/false.cmd were added because some app required them for a successful 
> build.
> 
> Binaries are available in later versions of the GNU Utils but not in the 
> versions in the baseline toolset.
> 
> What is your source for true.exe?
> 
>  
SAWATAISHI JUN's sh-utils-2.0

-- 
T.Sikora
tsikora at ntplx dot net


_______________________________________________
UX2BS mailing list
UX2BS at os2ports.com
http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs
**= Email   8 ==========================**

Date:  Thu, 2 Oct 2003 14:18:06 +0100
From:  John Poltorak <jp at warpix.org>
Subject:  Re:  Re: [XFreeOS2] Changes in building apps with Imake?

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:00:55AM -0400, T.Sikora wrote:
> Frank Giessler wrote:
> > Zitat von Holger Veit <holger.veit at ais.fhg.de>:
> > 
> > 
> >>On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:19:54PM +0200, Thomas Hoffmann wrote:
> >>
> >>>2) transferring Xfree/2 to a unixish location /usr/....
> >>
> >>This should be already supported now.
> > 
> > 
> > Any objections if I make the next version reside under /usr/X11R6 instead of
> > /XFree86 ?
> > 
> > Frank.
> > 
> Your going to make a whole lot of people happy especially the ux2 guys.

Yipee!

But I wonder how many Xfree86 apps will break as a result of this...
 
> -- 
> T.Sikora
> tsikora at ntplx dot net


-- 
John


_______________________________________________
UX2BS mailing list
UX2BS at os2ports.com
http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs
**= Email   9 ==========================**

Date:  Thu, 2 Oct 2003 17:11:48 +0100
From:  John Poltorak <jp at warpix.org>
Subject:  Re:  true.cmd

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:36:59AM -0400, T.Sikora wrote:
> John what was true/false.cmd for? I left them in because I had no idea 
> what depended on it but maybe true.cmd is interfering with true.exe.

true/false.cmd were added because some app required them for a successful 
build.

Binaries are available in later versions of the GNU Utils but not in the 
versions in the baseline toolset.

What is your source for true.exe?

 
> -- 
> T.Sikora
> tsikora at ntplx dot net


-- 
John


_______________________________________________
UX2BS mailing list
UX2BS at os2ports.com
http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs