Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 02:49:53 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [Ux2bs_Archive] No. 204 ************************************************** Tuesday 16 September 2003 Number 204 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Holes in emx library : James Moe" 2 Re: Innotek LIBC : Adrian Gschwend" 3 Re: Innotek LIBC : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de 4 gcc question : Jack Troughton 5 Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Innotek LIBC : Adrian Gschwend" 6 Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Innotek LIBC : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:35:40 -0700 (MST) From: "James Moe" Subject: Holes in emx library -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, There a couple of missing library functions in EMX that I have run across while building different packages. The header files exist, there are no object files in the libraries. - - syslog - - resolv Does anyone know where I can get these? - -- jimoe at sohnen-moe dot com pgp/gpg public key: http://www.keyserver.net/en/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0 OS/2 for non-commercial use Comment: PGP 5.0 for OS/2 Charset: cp850 wj8DBQE/aJtssxxMki0foKoRAkFfAKDJrriC9fCZ19I8MHr1krABA104bwCdEJpX qOkMyPWrVSFOJM+WXrGaLo8= =7oXc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:41:12 +0200 (CDT) From: "Adrian Gschwend" Subject: Re: Innotek LIBC On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:15:38 +0300, Alex Samorukov wrote: >My be its good idea to use innotek LIBC instead of the emx lib? Would make sense IMHO but so far I didn't saw any postings from Stefan, Andreas and the others about it. cu Adrian -- Adrian Gschwend at netlabs.org ktk [a t] netlabs.org ------- Free Software for OS/2 and eCS http://www.netlabs.org _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:49:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: Re: Innotek LIBC Adrian Gschwend schrieb: > >My be its good idea to use innotek LIBC instead of the > emx lib? > > Would make sense IMHO but so far I didn't saw > any postings from Stefan, Andreas and the > others about it. Well, since you're asking for opinions: IMHO, it would be a good idea to test innotek libc, but to be honest, I don't quite believe that it can be used as a drop-in replacement for EMX when it comes to programs that are using the stranger features of unix (out of the relatively small packages, rsync might be a good candidate for first tests, if you dare to look at large packages XFree would be interesting ...) - but of course I hope to be proven wrong... ;-) Regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:38:38 -0400 From: Jack Troughton Subject: gcc question This is pretty broad and not strictly relevant, but from the traffic, this is probably the best spot to ask this question. I've downloaded the new gcc, and am trying to build a pedagogical assembler called pep7. I don't have the environment set up properly for this to work. If someone could share the script they use to set up the environment, so I can check out what I'm missing and/or have wrong, I'd really appreciate it. If I can make a package that works, I'm going to pass it back to the publisher of the text I'm working from, in the hope that they might actually include it in their website. Thanks for any help anyone can offer. Regards, Jack -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- * Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca * * http://consultron.ca irc.ecomstation.ca * * Kingston Ontario Canada news://news.consultron.ca * ------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 17:33:27 +0200 (CDT) From: "Adrian Gschwend" Subject: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Innotek LIBC Again as followup, sent the first message to unixos2 by accident cu Adrian ==================BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE================== >Return-Path: >Original-Recipient: rfc822;ktk at tiscalinet.ch >Received: from notesserver1.innotek.de (212.12.46.231) by mx2.tiscali.ch (6.7.019) > id 3F42B5D9007355E2 for ktk at tiscali.ch; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:19:09 +0200 >Sensitivity: >Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Innotek LIBC >To: "Adrian Gschwend" >From: "Knut Osmundsen" >Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:25:58 +0200 >Message-ID: >X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notesserver1/InnoTek/DE(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at > 17.09.2003 14.25.59 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Hi. Just to keep their expectations realistic. There is _currently_ fork() implementation, neither does select() work on files - file handles and socket handles are not _yet_ shared. All this can be changed. Some things before others. Patches are highly appreciated!!! Kind Regards knut PS. Other areas which we like help is 64bit I/O, high memory heap, general work on updating headers and implementing/fixing functions as specified by the opengroup Unix Specifications. PPS. Use -Zomf if you like to debug your app. There will be a Beta3 or GA by the end of the month which will have 99% working HLL debug features. Meaning you can use icsdebug, idebug or idbug (i.e. IBM VisualAge and later debuggers) to debug you C and C++ applications. "Adrian Gschwend" on 09/17/2003 02:01:39 pm Please respond to "Adrian Gschwend" To: "bird at innotek.de" cc: Subject: Fwd: Re: Innotek LIBC ==================BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE================== >Return-Path: >Original-Recipient: rfc822;ktk at tiscalinet.ch >Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com (194.25.134.17) by mx1.tiscali.ch (6.7.019) > id 3F42B299007148C0 for ktk at tiscali.ch; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:50:06 +0200 >Received: from umsgate00.aul.t-online.de > by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp > id 19zY0g-0001Pr-04; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:50:02 +0200 >Received: from webmail.t-online.de (Gh9zFiZfZemopSLRyrJND63mSqLXpUGytDg0tJhYwEcyYYryWpnkUk at [172.18.16.206]) by umsgate00.bbul.t-online.de > with smtp id 19zY0e-1kM5r60; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:50:00 +0200 >To: Adrian Gschwend , UX2 Build System >Subject: Re: Innotek LIBC >From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de >Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:49:47 +0200 (CEST) >Message-ID: <1063788255.3f681edf4165a at webmail.t-online.de> >In-Reply-To: <0038402300.00011E0Z at netfinity.netlabs.org> >References: <0038402300.00011E0Z at netfinity.netlabs.org> >X-Approved: 84c764a22cd1ddf2D2FBKF-luHCOdbIid1HUTBgpNf1rxAA6 >X-Mailer: T-Online WebMail 3.10 >X-Complaints-To: abuse#webmail at t-online.com >X-Seen: false >X-ID: Gh9zFiZfZemopSLRyrJND63mSqLXpUGytDg0tJhYwEcyYYryWpnkUk at t-dialin.net > Adrian Gschwend schrieb: > >My be its good idea to use innotek LIBC instead of the > emx lib? > > Would make sense IMHO but so far I didn't saw > any postings from Stefan, Andreas and the > others about it. Well, since you're asking for opinions: IMHO, it would be a good idea to test innotek libc, but to be honest, I don't quite believe that it can be used as a drop-in replacement for EMX when it comes to programs that are using the stranger features of unix (out of the relatively small packages, rsync might be a good candidate for first tests, if you dare to look at large packages XFree would be interesting ...) - but of course I hope to be proven wrong... ;-) Regards, Stefan ===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE=================== -- Adrian Gschwend at netlabs.org ktk [a t] netlabs.org ------- Free Software for OS/2 and eCS http://www.netlabs.org ===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE=================== -- Adrian Gschwend at netlabs.org ktk [a t] netlabs.org ------- Free Software for OS/2 and eCS http://www.netlabs.org _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 18:11:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Innotek LIBC Adrian Gschwend schrieb: > Just to keep their expectations realistic. > There is _currently_ fork() implementation, I guess from context, there's a "no" missing? > neither does select() work on files - file > handles and socket handles are not _yet_ > shared. So that limits the range of programs which will work with that new libc pretty much for the moment (forget about e.g. rsync and XFree, in fact, probably forget about everything using sockets for now :-( ). > Patches are highly appreciated!!! Hm, there's currently a lack of time on my part... :-( wxWindows with its two releases (2.4.2 stable and 2.5.1 snapshot) that are expected soon is taking up pretty much of my limited spare time ... > PPS. Use -Zomf if you like to debug your app. > There will be a Beta3 or GA by the end of > the month which will have 99% working HLL > debug features. > Meaning you can use icsdebug, idebug or > idbug (i.e. IBM VisualAge and later > debuggers) to debug you C and C++ > applications. Any chance of making (pm)gdb work with the new compiler version? I don't care at all about all those other debuggers that I don't have and probably can't even get/use easily. Regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs