Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 02:45:39 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [Ux2bs_Archive] No. 162 ************************************************** Sunday 20 July 2003 Number 162 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: UX2BS refresh : Maynard" **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 07:10:56 -0500 (CDT) From: "Maynard" Subject: Re: UX2BS refresh On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 18:20:23 +0200 (CEST), Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: >> >With the current discussions about the future of EMX and >> it's successors >> Hi. Can somebody provide a current brief synopsis of >> these discussions? >Although I'm taking part in those discussion, I can't, >really. I guess besides "there are different opinions which >are just different", there's really nothing to be said. :-( >From this and two subsequent responses (thank you), I reason and humbly recommend that ux2bs take the opportunity to table further application inclusion, and posix/2 devel, and solidify its current application base for use with EMX; and bring its installation process to a satisfactorily improved level (logging debugging feedback); and package it up as a useful thing (go 'gold'), which generaly prepares for taking the next step forward after the library issue becomes more clear. Announcing a delightful and useful tool such as ux2bs already is, could bring more energy into the project. Thanks, -- Maynard _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs