Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 02:38:04 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [Ux2bs_Archive] No. 95 ************************************************** Monday 03 March 2003 Number 95 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? : Ted Sikora 2 Re: rsync : John Poltorak 3 Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? : Patrick Ash 4 Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? : Patrick Ash 5 SYSLOG library : John Poltorak 6 Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd again : brpms at earthlink.net 7 Re: rsync : John Poltorak 8 ux2_bootstrap.cmd? : Piersante Sestini 9 Re: rsync : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de 10 Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? : John Poltorak 11 Re: rsync : John Poltorak 12 CDRTOOLS source : John Poltorak 13 Re: rsync : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de 14 Re: rsync : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de 15 Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? : John Poltorak 16 io.h : Pazuzues 17 Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? : Piersante Sestini 18 Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd again : John Poltorak 19 ux2_bootstrap.cmd again : Piersante Sestini 20 Fetchmail : John Poltorak 21 emx docs : Dave Saville" 22 Re: emx docs : John Poltorak 23 Re: io.h : Henry Sobotka **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 07:01:57 +0000 From: Ted Sikora Subject: Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? Archives are here. http://os2ports.com/pipermail/ux2bs/ The webpage: http://os2ports.com/content/sections/ux2bs UX2BS How-To http://warped.mentabolism.org/UnixOS2/ux2bs.html Piersante Sestini wrote: > This is my first message to the list (I don't have access to previous > posting, so I apologize if this has been asked before): how can I get > ux2_bootstrap.cmd? The link on os2ports.com appears to be not working, > as also another on www.eyup.org, and I can't figure out an alternative > location. > > thanks, > Piersante > _______________________________________________ > UX2BS mailing list > UX2BS at os2ports.com > http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs > -- -- Ted Sikora tsikora at ntplx.net _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:33:10 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: rsync On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 07:54:08PM +0000, Dave Saville wrote: > >> e:\posix2\include\compat.h:55: parse error before `char' > >> make: *** [rsync.o] Error 1 > >> > >> > >> compat.h has O_EXLOXK set to 0, fcntl.h has it set to hex 40 > >> compat.h has O_SHLOCK set to 0, fcntl.h has it set to hex 20 > > > >These look like errors due to Posix/2... > > > Hmm What *is* this compat.h creature anyway? >From compat.h:- /* Fake missing symbols for BSD compatibility: This is only the * compatibility kitchen sink for bad hacks, you cannot live without. */ > -- > Regards > > Dave Saville -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 09:44:54 +0000 From: Patrick Ash Subject: Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 12:26:16 +0000, John Poltorak wrote: >> posting, so I apologize if this has been asked before): how can I get >> ux2_bootstrap.cmd? > >A new release is due very shortly, so you may want to give that a try >rather than getting the current one and changing things later... > >You can get the latest script using this command:- > >wget ftp://unixos2: at 213.152.37.92/pub/unixos2/build_system.test/lib/ux2_bootstrap.cmd > I have been attempting to start over from the beginning with a clean disk, and find that issuing the above command gives the following result: --09:40:21-- ftp://unixos2:*password* at 213.152.37.92/pub/unixos2/build_system.te st/lib/ux2_bootstrap.cmd => `ux2_bootstrap.cmd' Connecting to 213.152.37.92:21... failed: Connection refused. this has been the message I have received since Sunday. Pat -- Patrick Ash patash at comcast.net This OS/2 system uptime is 14 days, 17:51 hours and 56 seconds _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 10:57:45 +0000 From: Patrick Ash Subject: Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? works fine now. Thanks, John. Pat On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 14:49:27 +0000, John Poltorak wrote: >On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:44:54AM +0000, Patrick Ash wrote: > >> I have been attempting to start over from the beginning with a clean >> disk, and find that issuing the above command gives the following >> result: >> >> --09:40:21-- >> ftp://unixos2:*password* at 213.152.37.92/pub/unixos2/build_system.te >> st/lib/ux2_bootstrap.cmd >> >> => `ux2_bootstrap.cmd' >> >> Connecting to 213.152.37.92:21... failed: Connection refused. > >Oops! My fault. > >Can you try again? > -- Patrick Ash patash at comcast.net This OS/2 system uptime is 14 days, 19:04 hours and 48 seconds _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:02:07 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: SYSLOG library I need to build a SYSLOG library. Does anyone know where I can get the source? -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 11:41:45 -0700 From: brpms at earthlink.net Subject: Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd again In <20030304170940.N83 at manninghammills.org>, on 03/04/03 at 05:09 PM, John Poltorak said: >On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:00:57PM +0100, Piersante Sestini wrote: > >> I still have two (very basic) problems which don't seem to be completely >> covered in the how-to: >> >> 1) I don't have a link386.exe. How can I get one? >It comes with Warp. I originally thought it was part of the default >installation but apparenetly not. >You can install it using select install - not sure which option though... >If you look on your CD, it is in a bundle called LINK - on disk_18 under >MCP2, maybe somewhere else on other distributions. >> 2) I already have an emx runtime install somewhere in my system. What >> should I do: Uninstall? Replace? Ignore? >I would ignore it. >With the new UX2BS, EMXRT gets installed under \unixos2 so shouldn't >interfere with your existing environment. Installing UX2BS does not mess >with your CONFIG.SYS and you do not need to reboot. It basically creates >its own environment through a build shell. I have found that working in the shell seems to leave things in memory that interfere with other programs that use emx. It gets solved by a reboot, so something is not cleaned up by closing the OS/2 window. > >> thanks, >> Piersante Paul Schwartz -- ----------------------------------------------------------- brpms at earthlink.net ----------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 7 ==========================** Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 12:08:25 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: rsync On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:13:37PM +0100, Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > John Poltorak schrieb: > > > Hmm What *is* this compat.h creature anyway? > > > > >From compat.h:- > > > > /* Fake missing symbols for BSD compatibility: This is > > only the > > * compatibility kitchen sink for bad hacks, you cannot > > live without. > > */ > > Even worse, sys/fcntl.h says "Those things are not > implemented (yet)", but defines them to a different > value than compat.h. :-( > Just delete the offending defines from one of the > two files and things should work... Which one is correct? > Regards, > Stefan -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 8 ==========================** Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 12:11:18 +0100 From: Piersante Sestini Subject: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? This is my first message to the list (I don't have access to previous posting, so I apologize if this has been asked before): how can I get ux2_bootstrap.cmd? The link on os2ports.com appears to be not working, as also another on www.eyup.org, and I can't figure out an alternative location. thanks, Piersante _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 9 ==========================** Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 12:13:37 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: Re: rsync John Poltorak schrieb: > > Hmm What *is* this compat.h creature anyway? > > >From compat.h:- > > /* Fake missing symbols for BSD compatibility: This is > only the > * compatibility kitchen sink for bad hacks, you cannot > live without. > */ Even worse, sys/fcntl.h says "Those things are not implemented (yet)", but defines them to a different value than compat.h. :-( Just delete the offending defines from one of the two files and things should work... Regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 10 ==========================** Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 12:26:16 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:11:18PM +0100, Piersante Sestini wrote: > This is my first message to the list (I don't have access to previous > posting, so I apologize if this has been asked before): how can I get > ux2_bootstrap.cmd? A new release is due very shortly, so you may want to give that a try rather than getting the current one and changing things later... You can get the latest script using this command:- wget ftp://unixos2: at 213.152.37.92/pub/unixos2/build_system.test/lib/ux2_bootstrap.cmd > thanks, > Piersante -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 11 ==========================** Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 12:27:59 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: rsync On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:15:16PM +0100, Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > John Poltorak schrieb: > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:13:37PM +0100, > > > > Just delete the offending defines from one of the > > > two files and things should work... > > > > Which one is correct? > > Since it's not implemented anyway, I don't have a > preference about correctness. But will you be updating Posix/2 since now that conflict has been pointed discovered? > Regards, > Stefan -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 12 ==========================** Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 12:34:24 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: CDRTOOLS source Is their any source available for the OS/2 port of CDRTOOLS? I'd like to see if I can build it with the build system... -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 13 ==========================** Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 13:15:16 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: Re: rsync John Poltorak schrieb: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:13:37PM +0100, > > Just delete the offending defines from one of the > > two files and things should work... > > Which one is correct? Since it's not implemented anyway, I don't have a preference about correctness. Defining things to 0 (as in compat.h) insures that they are completely ignored for now, defining them to the values taken from BSD (as in sys/fcntl.h) avoids a need for changing those defines at some later point in time. Regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 14 ==========================** Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 13:35:37 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: Re: rsync John Poltorak schrieb: > But will you be updating Posix/2 since now that conflict > has been pointed > discovered? Sure. Next weekend ... Regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 15 ==========================** Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:49:27 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:44:54AM +0000, Patrick Ash wrote: > I have been attempting to start over from the beginning with a clean > disk, and find that issuing the above command gives the following > result: > > --09:40:21-- > ftp://unixos2:*password* at 213.152.37.92/pub/unixos2/build_system.te > st/lib/ux2_bootstrap.cmd > > => `ux2_bootstrap.cmd' > > Connecting to 213.152.37.92:21... failed: Connection refused. Oops! My fault. Can you try again? > Pat > > -- > Patrick Ash > patash at comcast.net > > This OS/2 system uptime is 14 days, 17:51 hours and 56 seconds -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 16 ==========================** Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:29:34 -0900 From: Pazuzues Subject: io.h i'm trying to port a software code that uses _findfirst _findnext, and _findclose that is supposed to be in included in io.h. My install of EMX 0.9d does not have the find functions in the io.h. Is there an alternative? _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 17 ==========================** Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 16:57:47 +0100 From: Piersante Sestini Subject: Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd? John Poltorak wrote: > Can you try again? now it works, thanks! Piersante _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 18 ==========================** Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 17:09:40 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: ux2_bootstrap.cmd again On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 06:00:57PM +0100, Piersante Sestini wrote: > > I still have two (very basic) problems which don't seem to be completely > covered in the how-to: > > 1) I don't have a link386.exe. How can I get one? It comes with Warp. I originally thought it was part of the default installation but apparenetly not. You can install it using select install - not sure which option though... If you look on your CD, it is in a bundle called LINK - on disk_18 under MCP2, maybe somewhere else on other distributions. > 2) I already have an emx runtime install somewhere in my system. What > should I do: Uninstall? Replace? Ignore? I would ignore it. With the new UX2BS, EMXRT gets installed under \unixos2 so shouldn't interfere with your existing environment. Installing UX2BS does not mess with your CONFIG.SYS and you do not need to reboot. It basically creates its own environment through a build shell. > thanks, > Piersante -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 19 ==========================** Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 18:00:57 +0100 From: Piersante Sestini Subject: ux2_bootstrap.cmd again I still have two (very basic) problems which don't seem to be completely covered in the how-to: 1) I don't have a link386.exe. How can I get one? 2) I already have an emx runtime install somewhere in my system. What should I do: Uninstall? Replace? Ignore? thanks, Piersante _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 20 ==========================** Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 19:14:45 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Fetchmail Has anyone tried building fetchmail v6.21 using this archive:- ? ftp://os2ports.com/incoming/fetchmail621b1.zip I would like to incorporate it into UX2BS but can't get it to compile cleanly after applying the patches... -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 21 ==========================** Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 21:05:54 +0000 (GMT) From: "Dave Saville" Subject: emx docs The build system does not appear to install the documentation. -- Regards Dave Saville _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 22 ==========================** Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 21:27:24 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: emx docs On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:05:54PM +0000, Dave Saville wrote: > The build system does not appear to install the documentation. It is not intended to be a development environment as such, so a lot of the EMX package is intentionally left out. I've tried to put together the minimal subset of tools required for building apps. The whole of EMX is quite a sizable package and I didn't want to clutter up the build system unnecessarily. > -- > Regards > > Dave Saville -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 23 ==========================** Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 21:43:38 -0500 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: io.h Pazuzues wrote: > > i'm trying to port a software code that uses _findfirst _findnext, and > _findclose that is supposed to be in included in io.h. My install of > EMX 0.9d does not have the find functions in the io.h. Is there an > alternative? os2emx.h declares DosFindFirst, DosFindNext and DosFindClose; you might try mapping or wrapping them. h~ _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs