Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 02:35:58 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [Ux2bs_Archive] No. 90 ************************************************** Wednesday 26 February 2003 Number 90 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Problem building FILE : John Poltorak 2 Python : John Poltorak 3 Re: Python : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de 4 Re: SED builds : Andreas Buening **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:48:14 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Problem building FILE On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 01:10:31PM +0000, John Poltorak wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 12:38:35PM +0100, Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > couldn't tell > > > exactly which #defines needed moving... Is it just those > > > two or should I > > > move the whole 'struct magic' somewhere else? > > > > In case of doubt: > > Move all the defines into a new file, but leave > > the struct itself where it currently is. > > (No those #defines do not need to be scattered > > across the lines of the struct definition.) > > That worked for me. > > OK I've done that, but am left with:- > > Undefined symbol _os2_apptype. > > Any ideas on what is missing? I found the program apptype.c in an OS/2 port of FILE, and after adding that and making a few changes to the Makefile, it worked. Is this a program you needed to add? -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:34:11 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Python If anyone has Python installed on a Unix system, could you say where it is installed? I'm wondering if there is a generally agreed location for it... -- John _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:58:45 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: Re: Python John Poltorak schrieb: > If anyone has Python installed on a Unix system, could > you say where it is > installed? I'm wondering if there is a generally agreed > location for it... With Linux distributions, there's typically /usr/bin/python(2.2) and /usr/lib/python2.2. I wonder, if the latter shouldn't really be /usr/share/lib/python2.2, though. Regards, Stefan _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:50:09 +0100 From: Andreas Buening Subject: Re: SED builds John Poltorak wrote: > > I've just managed to build SED v4.05, but it's absolutely ENORMOUS! > > The one in the baseline toolset is only 17kB, but the one I've just built > is 256kB!! They are different versions and the old one uses a REGEX DLL > but still shouldn't account for such a huge size increase. > > Is this just due to code bloat? My version has 55296 bytes. The extra 40 KB are due to the new regex which is now linked statically. 4.05 doesn't support an external regex any more. But for the extra 200 KB ... what exactly did you do? Bye, Andreas -- One OS to rule them all, One OS to find them, One OS to bring them all and in the darkness bind them In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. _______________________________________________ UX2BS mailing list UX2BS at os2ports.com http://os2ports.com/mailman/listinfo/ux2bs