Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:42 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 703 ************************************************** Tuesday 16 May 2006 Number 703 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: gtak aspitape scsitape : Brendan Oakley" 2 Re: gtak aspitape scsitape : Yuri Dario" **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:32:23 -0700 From: "Brendan Oakley" Subject: Re: gtak aspitape scsitape What is the appeal of GTAK, over something perhaps more current? I've never looked at it. Brendan **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 19:29:54 +0200 (CDT) From: "Yuri Dario" Subject: Re: gtak aspitape scsitape Hi, >What is the appeal of GTAK, over something perhaps more current? I've >never looked at it. star backup is on hobbes now, compared to gtar/tak it misses only tape support (and ACL). Bye, Yuri Dario /* * member of TeamOS/2 - Italy * http://www.os2power.com/yuri * http://www.teamos2.it */