Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:05:20 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 595 ************************************************** Wednesday 03 August 2005 Number 595 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: make 3.81 Beta 3 : Knut St. Osmundsen" 2 Re: make 3.81 Beta 3 : Yuri Dario" 3 libc06 rather complete (was: make 3.81 Beta 3) : Franz Bakan" 4 Re: libc06 rather complete : Knut St. Osmundsen" 5 Re: make 3.81 Beta 3 : mentore.siesto at libero.it 6 Re: make produces exec of unknown type : Csaba Raduly 7 PHP5 : Lewis G Rosenthal **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 16:28:44 +0200 From: "Knut St. Osmundsen" Subject: Re: make 3.81 Beta 3 Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: [snip] > The only thing I currently know about are pthreads, but then, I'm not > really sure if they are actually worth the pain of imple- menting > them. Just a little PS. I will implement pthreads in LIBC 0.7, not because I really need them for anything myself, but because I want to explore how the pthread specification works in real life. But first, I have to fix all the 0.6 issues and get it thru one or two more releases. Kind Regards, knut **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 17:39:18 +0200 (CDT) From: "Yuri Dario" Subject: Re: make 3.81 Beta 3 Hi, >my "feeling" meanwhile is that libc06 should be >a rather complete replacement for EMX, with the >"porting" effort being actually reduced to possibly >removing some EMX specific hacks that are no +1 >missing from libc06? The only thing I currently >know about are pthreads, but then, I'm not really since make doesn't use them, job is easier ;-) Bye, Yuri Dario /* * member of TeamOS/2 - Italy * http://www.os2power.com/yuri * http://www.teamos2.it */ **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 18:10:35 +0200 (CEST) From: "Franz Bakan" Subject: libc06 rather complete (was: make 3.81 Beta 3) On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 11:07:54 +0200 (CEST), Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: .... >Do you know about something that's actually >missing from libc06? it's not relevant for make, but if someone has time/knowledge... the _inp.. / _outp.. functions are still missing from libc see ...\usr\include\sys\hw.h Franz **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:42:15 +0200 From: "Knut St. Osmundsen" Subject: Re: libc06 rather complete Franz Bakan wrote: > On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 11:07:54 +0200 (CEST), Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > > ... > >>Do you know about something that's actually >>missing from libc06? > > > it's not relevant for make, but if someone has time/knowledge... > > the _inp.. / _outp.. functions are still missing from libc > > see ...\usr\include\sys\hw.h Feel free to contribute those :-) Kind Regards, knut **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:37:34 +0300 From: mentore.siesto at libero.it Subject: Re: make 3.81 Beta 3 In <42EF831C.7050307 at anduin.net>, on 08/02/2005 at 04:28 PM, "Knut St. Osmundsen" said: >Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: >[snip] >> The only thing I currently know about are pthreads, but then, I'm not >> really sure if they are actually worth the pain of imple- menting >> them. >Just a little PS. I will implement pthreads in LIBC 0.7, not because I >really need them for anything myself, but because I want to explore how >the pthread specification works in real life. But first, I have to fix >all the 0.6 issues and get it thru one or two more releases. I just started trying to make pthreads6 work. These news are good news. Mentore **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 01:18:39 +0100 From: Csaba Raduly Subject: Re: make produces exec of unknown type Pete Milne wrote: > I'm trying to build ncftp 3.1.9. The build process completes and leaves > me with five .exe files in the ./bin directory. However, none of these > will run - they are all of 'unknown' type. I have made no changes to the > source except to move the contents of ./autoconf into the top level > directory. What was the exact GCC commandline in the final link steps ? (the ones without -c) **= Email 7 ==========================** Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 21:00:28 -0400 From: Lewis G Rosenthal Subject: PHP5 Has anyone managed to build the above or know of a compiled distro (any rev of PHP5)? -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------ Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA, CLE Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com eComStation Consultants www.ecomstation.com Novell Users International www.novell.com/linux/truth Warpstock 2005 - Hershey, Pennsylvania, October 6-9, 2005 www.warpstock.org ------------------------------------------------------------