Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 00:05:15 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 556 ************************************************** Tuesday 24 May 2005 Number 556 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 ported Swish-e 2.4.3 : lsunley at mb.sympatico.ca 2 Re: ported Swish-e 2.4.3 : Dave Yeo" 3 Re: ported Swish-e 2.4.3 : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 00:06:10 -0500 From: lsunley at mb.sympatico.ca Subject: ported Swish-e 2.4.3 Hi guys I did a build of swish-e 2.4.3 and uploaded it to http://hobbes.nmsu.edu in the file swish-e-2.4.3.zip (includes the configured build tree) Outside of the ./configure not wanting to recognize that I had sed.exe and ar.exe present it built "out of the box: with GCC 3.3.5 b4 Lorne -- ----------------------------------------------------------- lsunley at mb.sympatico.ca ----------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 23:16:03 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: ported Swish-e 2.4.3 On Tue, 24 May 2005 00:06:10 -0500, lsunley at mb.sympatico.ca wrote: >Outside of the ./configure not wanting to recognize that I had sed.exe and >ar.exe present it built "out of the box: with GCC 3.3.5 b4 Did you try Set SED=sed.exe and Set AR=ar.exe? I have a lot of these defined in config.site eg SED=sed.exe AR=ar.exe AWK=gawk.exe etc config.site can be defined by %CONFIG>SITE% or configure will find it if it is in $PREFIX/share. Dave **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 12:30:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: Re: ported Swish-e 2.4.3 Dave Yeo schrieb: > On Tue, 24 May 2005 00:06:10 -0500, > lsunley at mb.sympatico.ca wrote: > > >Outside of the ./configure not wanting to recognize that > I had sed.exe and > >ar.exe present it built "out of the box: with GCC 3.3.5 > b4 > > Did you try Set SED=sed.exe and Set AR=ar.exe? More generally, setting ac_executable_extensions (or whatever the exact name) can be quite helpful if you're trying to use existing configure scripts without first regenerating them with an OS/2 friendly autoconf release. Regards, Stefan