Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:04:16 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 521 ************************************************** Monday 14 February 2005 Number 521 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 gcc-3.3.5-beta4 & emxomf? : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de 2 Re: gcc-3.3.5-beta4 & emxomf? : Andy Willis 3 Re: gcc-3.3.5-beta4 & emxomf? : Dave Yeo" 4 Re: gcc-3.3.5-beta4 & emxomf? : Knut St. Osmundsen" **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:08:15 +0100 From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: gcc-3.3.5-beta4 & emxomf? Hi, Anybody else having problems with emxomf? To me it appears to be completely broken... Just going into include directory and running e.g. "emxomf -s -l libstdc++.a" (the standard to generate a .lib from a .a, isn't it?) just gives me a "usage message", i.e. > emxomf 0.6b4.0 (Innotek Build 2005-01-17 09:41) -- Copyright (c) 1992-1995 by Eberhard Mattes > > Usage: > emxomf [-dgqs] [-l[]] [-m ] [-p ] > [-i ] [-I ] [-D ] > -o > emxomf [-dgqsx] [-l[]] [-m ] [-p ] > [-O ] [-r|R ] [-i ] > [-I ] [-D ] ... (snipp) and no .lib file. Regards, Stefan **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:08:37 -0700 From: Andy Willis Subject: Re: gcc-3.3.5-beta4 & emxomf? Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > Hi, > >Anybody else having problems with emxomf? >To me it appears to be completely broken... >Just going into include directory and running e.g. >"emxomf -s -l libstdc++.a" (the standard to generate >a .lib from a .a, isn't it?) just gives me a "usage >message", i.e. > > >>emxomf 0.6b4.0 (Innotek Build 2005-01-17 09:41) -- Copyright (c) 1992-1995 by Eberhard Mattes >> >>Usage: >> emxomf [-dgqs] [-l[]] [-m ] [-p ] >> [-i ] [-I ] [-D ] >> -o >> emxomf [-dgqsx] [-l[]] [-m ] [-p ] >> [-O ] [-r|R ] [-i ] >> [-I ] [-D ] ... >> >> >(snipp) >and no .lib file. > > Regards, > Stefan > > > It isn't completely broken... it is used to build Mozilla and I am posting this from Mozilla Mail which I built with gcc 3.3.5 beta 4. Andy **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:20:13 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: gcc-3.3.5-beta4 & emxomf? On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:08:15 +0100, Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > Hi, > >Anybody else having problems with emxomf? >To me it appears to be completely broken... >Just going into include directory and running e.g. >"emxomf -s -l libstdc++.a" (the standard to generate >a .lib from a .a, isn't it?) just gives me a "usage >message", i.e. Try emxomf -t -s -p128 (Stolen from MakeOmfLibs.cmd) Dave **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:24:38 +0100 From: "Knut St. Osmundsen" Subject: Re: gcc-3.3.5-beta4 & emxomf? The -l option is apparently not working correctly. I've put this on the todo list. Btw. -p128 isn't necessary. The page size should be automagically terminated, only use it when the magic fails. Kind Regards, knut PS. There should be no reason for converting libstdc++.a, MakeOmfLibs.cmd already does this. Dave Yeo wrote: > On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:08:15 +0100, Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >>Anybody else having problems with emxomf? >>To me it appears to be completely broken... >>Just going into include directory and running e.g. >>"emxomf -s -l libstdc++.a" (the standard to generate >>a .lib from a .a, isn't it?) just gives me a "usage >>message", i.e. > > > Try emxomf -t -s -p128 (Stolen from MakeOmfLibs.cmd) > Dave > >