Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 00:04:17 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 466 ************************************************** Friday 03 December 2004 Number 466 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: No sys/sysctl.h in GCC 3.3.5 : Bart van Leeuwen" 2 Re: No sys/sysctl.h in GCC 3.3.5 : Sebastian Wittmeier" **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:11:03 +0100 From: "Bart van Leeuwen" Subject: Re: No sys/sysctl.h in GCC 3.3.5 Hi, are there people actualy building the inetutils package ? I'm working on it as well, and it would be a great set of utils to replace all the ibm utils. Addressed directly to John: Since you do such a great effort of trying everything out, and the big motor behind this list, could you organize a list or something where people can find utils that are beeing worked on, and the people who work on that ? that way we prevent double work, and maybe increase effort if people join forces. With Regards Bart van Leeuwen **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 18:14:04 +0100 (CET) From: "Sebastian Wittmeier" Subject: Re: No sys/sysctl.h in GCC 3.3.5 Hi Bart, hi John, perhaps you would also like to coordinate with OSFree (that's the project which is about programming; FreeOS was about talking). At the moment they are recreating the command line utilities, porting ping and tracerte from BSD. See http://www.osfree.org/index.php?gobaby=status Sebastian