Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:04:16 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 453 ************************************************** Saturday 20 November 2004 Number 453 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Bind v9 : John Poltorak 2 Re: Bind v9 : IanM" 3 Re: Bind v9 : John Poltorak 4 gcc list at netlabs : John Poltorak **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:02:56 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Bind v9 What are the problems with getting Bind v9 to build on OS/2, and is there any chance of gcc 3.3.5 alleviating those problems? -- John **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 00:37:09 +1100 (EDT) From: "IanM" Subject: Re: Bind v9 Hi John > What are the problems with getting Bind v9 to build on OS/2, and is > there any chance of gcc 3.3.5 alleviating those problems? I've just downloaded gcc 3.3.5 to give it a go on Bind v8.4.5, wouldnt even try Bind v9.x unless it builds v8.x.x ok. Cheers IanM http://www.os2site.com/ There's no intelligent life down here, Scotty. They use Windows. **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:58:21 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Bind v9 On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 12:37:09AM +1100, IanM wrote: > Hi John > > > What are the problems with getting Bind v9 to build on OS/2, and is > > there any chance of gcc 3.3.5 alleviating those problems? > > I've just downloaded gcc 3.3.5 to give it a go on Bind v8.4.5, wouldnt > even try Bind v9.x unless it builds v8.x.x ok. How difficult it is to build the current latest release (8.2.4)? ISTR that at the time v4.9.7 was out it included OS/2 support in the distribution... Or have I just imagined that? Best of luck with 8.4.5, it's over three years since the last update. It would be nice to have something a little bit more uptodate. BTW I saw something on USENET about the netlabs team tackling Bind v9... Anyone know anything about it? > Cheers > IanM > http://www.os2site.com/ > > There's no intelligent life down here, Scotty. They use Windows. -- John **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:23:46 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: gcc list at netlabs I saw an OS2VOICE announcement about a gcc list at netlabs so thought I'd give it a go. Here's what I got:- ----- The following addresses had delivery problems ----- (unrecoverable error) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- .... while talking to mail.netlabs.org.: >>> RCPT To:^M <<< 550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name (#5.1.1 - chkusr) 550 ... User unknown Can anyone try and draw Adrian's attention to this? -- John