Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:04:22 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 429 ************************************************** Tuesday 26 October 2004 Number 429 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Warpzilla build progress : Dave Yeo" 2 Re: Warpzilla build progress : John Poltorak 3 RE: GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 : Dave Webster" 4 Re: Warpzilla build progress : Henry Sobotka 5 Re: Warpzilla build progress : mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) 6 Re: Warpzilla build progress : John Poltorak 7 Re: XFreeOS2 list gone? : John Poltorak 8 Re: Warpzilla build progress : Henry Sobotka 9 Re: Warpzilla build progress : John Poltorak 10 Re: Warpzilla build progress : Henry Sobotka 11 Re: (OT?) XFree86 mailing list status : Dave Yeo" 12 Re: XFreeOS2 list gone? : Dave Yeo" 13 Re: Apps using ZLIB : Dave Yeo" 14 Re: Zlib 1.2.1 : Dave Yeo" 15 Re: Warpzilla Build Instructions : Dave Yeo" 16 Re: (OT?) XFree86 mailing list status : Kris Steenhaut 17 NCURSES 5.4 : John Poltorak 18 Re: Warpzilla build progress : John Poltorak 19 Re: NCURSES 5.4 : Thomas Dickey 20 Re: NCURSES 5.4 : Thomas Dickey 21 Re: NCURSES 5.4 : John Poltorak 22 Re: Warpzilla build progress : Henry Sobotka 23 Re: NCURSES 5.4 : Thomas Dickey **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 07:41:00 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:28:40 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: >If I want to continue the build without recreating the Makefiles through >configure, do I just run:- ? > >make -f client.mk This will update the tree via CVS. make -f client.mk build is what you want Dave **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:02:02 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 07:41:00AM -0800, Dave Yeo wrote: > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:28:40 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > > >If I want to continue the build without recreating the Makefiles through > >configure, do I just run:- ? > > > >make -f client.mk > > This will update the tree via CVS. make -f client.mk build is what you want With make -f client.mk build, will make simply continue from where it left off if all the required Makefiles were created? I'm currently in a position where a number of libs have been built successfully but I'v run out of disk space. I don't want to have to start again from scratch. Any ideas on how much disk space is required for the mozilla build? > Dave -- John **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:51:36 -0500 From: "Dave Webster" Subject: RE: GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 I think I'll let this get to Beta before I give it a try with my internal libs. I'm trying to wrap up a total overhaul of my internal wxWidgets sources, making them full ISO C++ compliant and subbing all my own non-GUI components for wxWidgets components, and making it all happy with gcc 3.4.1 on Linux, Visual Studio.NET 2005 Beta on WIN32 and Innotek gcc 3.2.2 on OS/2. As you know, I'm already seeing some visual oddities with the main wxWidgets sources built using the Innotek gcc compiler, so don't want to introduce another unknown variable at this time. I do however, look forward to making the switch, eventually. -----Original Message----- From: owner-os2-unix at warpix.org [mailto:owner-os2-unix at warpix.org]On Behalf Of Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 12:36 PM To: Knut St. Osmundsen Subject: Re: GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 Hi, > I've just put out GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 for every one to play > with. It's currently available at: > ftp://ftp.netlabs.org/pub/gcc/GCC-3.3.4-alpha2.zip Just wanted to say that I found some time to give it a quick check today, and while current wxWindows builds just fine with it, it has socket support disabled, since configure fails on something essentially like this: [G:\wxWidgets\build\pm-new]type main.c main(){ socket(); } So. 24.10.2004 18.34.39 Uhr [G:\wxWidgets\build\pm-new]gcc -o main.exe main.c -lsocket J:/gcc-3.3/usr/lib/libsocket.a(socket.o): Undefined symbol "___libc_timebomb" re ferenced Regards, Stefan cc: os2-unix at mail.warpix.org **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:32:46 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress John Poltorak wrote: > > With make -f client.mk build, will make simply continue from where it left > off if all the required Makefiles were created? Yes, though it'll go through the list of directories to find the spot where it has to pick up again, i.e. you'll see a lot of "entering..." "nothing to do", "leaving..." etc. until it resumes building. The build is divided into two cycles, export and libs. The first mainly builds nspr and a couple tools in xpcom, then goes through the entire tree generating headers from .idl files and copying them along with static headers to dist/include. The actual compilation follows in the libs cycle. You can also build by simply running "make" in the root objdir, in which case it'll go through export and libs. You can also use "make export", and when that's done, "make libs". This is useful if you get a break in the libs cycle to bypass running through export again just to see a whole lot of "nothing to do" (especially if you're on a slow machine). But then if you've gotten to the stage where the build is running, you're unlikely to encounter breaks except for something like running out of disk space. > Any ideas on how much disk space is required for the mozilla build? Optimized build about 300MB, debug about 700MB; though to be safe 500MB and 1G respectively. h~ **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:46:50 -0500 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:02:02 +0100 John Poltorak wrote: > > Any ideas on how much disk space is required for the mozilla build? A couple of months ago it took me 430 MB for the FireFox source tree (plus compilation results - that's with a number of options omitted). They might have added some software function since then. Now, if your .mozconfig file has 'ac_add_options --enable-debug' then the number is something ridiculous like 1400 MB. mikus **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:49:40 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:32:46PM -0400, Henry Sobotka wrote: > John Poltorak wrote: > But then if you've gotten to the stage where the build is running, > you're unlikely to encounter breaks except for something like running > out of disk space. Is there any way to tell how far things have got? Having a build log to compare against could be useful... > > Any ideas on how much disk space is required for the mozilla build? > > Optimized build about 300MB, debug about 700MB; though to be safe 500MB > and 1G respectively. I wish I had known. It might be worth mentioning this on the setup page. > h~ -- John **= Email 7 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:23:11 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: XFreeOS2 list gone? On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 09:50:15PM -0800, Dave Yeo wrote: > On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:59:34 -0800, Dave Yeo wrote: > > >I sent Holger an email about the problems, hasn't bounced back yet so hopefully he'll get it > > Holger said they've made some mods on their mail system and will look into it. > BTW I posted a test message today and it never bounced, just seems to of vanished. > John the address I have for the XFree86/2 list is xfreeos2 at xfreeos2.dyndns.org not xfreeos2 at citytraffic.de I just wrote to the list at xfreeos2 at xfreeos2.dyndns.org. My msg is viewable in the list archives here:- http://ct-mail.citytraffic.de/pipermail/xfreeos2/2004-October/date.html but nothing has come back to me. > Dave -- John **= Email 8 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 16:02:13 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress John Poltorak wrote: > > Is there any way to tell how far things have got? Having a build log to > compare against could be useful... I normally use the list of directories that starts around line 105 in the root makefile and ends on 375 with xpfe/bootstrap. And you can tell whether you're in export or libs by whether it's generating and installing headers, or actually compiling with gcc/g++ (except for nspr and the xpcom tools that get built in export). There are buildlogs online at tinderbox.mozilla.org. There you have to distinguish between dependency (partial) and clobber (full) builds. >>>Any ideas on how much disk space is required for the mozilla build? >> >>Optimized build about 300MB, debug about 700MB; though to be safe 500MB >>and 1G respectively. > > > I wish I had known. It might be worth mentioning this on the setup page. I was surprised to find it wasn't there when I looked this morning. You might want to suggest it in the NG. And my numbers above are for objdir, i.e. excluding source code. h~ **= Email 9 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:54:42 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 04:02:13PM -0400, Henry Sobotka wrote: > John Poltorak wrote: > > > > Is there any way to tell how far things have got? Having a build log to > > compare against could be useful... > > I normally use the list of directories that starts around line 105 in > the root makefile and ends on 375 with xpfe/bootstrap. And you can tell > whether you're in export or libs by whether it's generating and > installing headers, or actually compiling with gcc/g++ (except for nspr > and the xpcom tools that get built in export). Well it looks to have finished after many hours, not sure what to look for in the event of a successfull build... something like obj\mozilla.exe ? In any event the build failed with errors... This is where things started to go wrong:- echo gfxshared_s.lib gfxshared_s.lib C:/MOZTOOLS/nsinstall -m 644 gfxshared_s.lib ../../../dist/lib make.exe[5]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/gfx/src/shared' make.exe[5]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/gfx/src/os2' nsDeviceContextSpecOS2.cpp g++ -o nsDeviceContextSpecOS2.o -c -DOSTYPE=\"OS22\" -DOSARCH=\"OS2\" -DHAVE_DEPENDENT_LIBS -DUSE_OS2_TOOLKIT_HEADERS -I../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../dist/include/string -I../../../dist/include/widget -I../../../dist/include/view -I../../../dist/include/util -I../../../dist/include/pref -I../../../dist/include/uconv -I../../../dist/include/locale -I../../../dist/include/unicharutil -I../../../dist/include/imglib2 -I../../../dist/include/gfx -I../../../dist/include -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/include/nspr -I. -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/shared -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/windows -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconversion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -pedantic -Zomf -pipe -DDEBUG -D_DEBUG -DDEBUG_ -DTRACING -g -fno-inline -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../../mozilla-config.h -Uunix -U__unix -U__unix__ -Wp,-MD,.deps/nsDeviceContextSpecOS2.pp G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/os2/nsDeviceContextSpecOS2.cpp In file included from D:/gcc322/include/os2.h:30, from G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/os2/nsGFXDefs.h:33, from G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/os2/nsDeviceContextSpecOS2.h:59, from G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/os2/nsDeviceContextSpecOS2.cpp:24: D:/gcc322/include/os2tk.h:8:20: os2def.h: No such file or directory D:/gcc322/include/os2tk.h:117:17: bse.h: No such file or directory D:/gcc322/include/os2tk.h:140:16: pm.h: No such file or directory In file included from G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/os2/nsDeviceContextSpecOS2.h:59, from G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/os2/nsDeviceContextSpecOS2.cpp:24: G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/os2/nsGFXDefs.h:94: `HPS' was not declared in this scope G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/os2/nsGFXDefs.h:94: parse error before `,' token G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/os2/nsGFXDefs.h:95: `HPS' was not declared in this scope G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/os2/nsGFXDefs.h:95: parse error before `,' token G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/gfx/src/os2/nsGFXDefs.h:98: parse error before `)' token Is this because the headers from the OS/2 Toolkit are missing? > h~ -- John **= Email 10 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:28:59 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress John Poltorak wrote: > > Well it looks to have finished after many hours, not sure what to look for > in the event of a successfull build... something like obj\mozilla.exe ? dist/bin/mozilla.exe which is built last in xpfe/bootstrap/. > In any event the build failed with errors... This is where things started > to go wrong:- > [snip] > > Is this because the headers from the OS/2 Toolkit are missing? Yup. At /gfx, you're about a third of the way through. h~ **= Email 11 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:29:36 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: (OT?) XFree86 mailing list status On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 08:44:49 +0200, Kris Steenhaut wrote: >Dave Yeo schreef: > >>Just wondering about the XFree86 mailing list status. Last week I >>posted this >>http://xfreeos2.dyndns.org/pipermail/xfreeos2/2004-October/000436.html >>and it never showed up here as well as no responses. Did anyone who is >>subscribed to the list see this message? >>Also anyone have any ideas about the problem, I'm not that up on shell >>scripts >>Dave >> >> >> >As the message was addressed specific at "Frank" I had no intension to >reply and maybe others had the very same meaning... Hi Kris, have you seen any other messages, I sent a test message and John sent something too. Also are you subscribed to the digest or indivual messages? Dave **= Email 12 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:27:47 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: XFreeOS2 list gone? On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:23:11 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > >I just wrote to the list at xfreeos2 at xfreeos2.dyndns.org. > >My msg is viewable in the list archives here:- > >http://ct-mail.citytraffic.de/pipermail/xfreeos2/2004-October/date.html > >but nothing has come back to me. Yes the same as happened with me, my test message did eventually show up in the archives. Perhaps Holger is busy. Dave **= Email 13 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:55:05 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: Apps using ZLIB On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:57:48 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > >Does XFree86 need its own version of ZLIB? I'd really like to elminate as >much redundancy as possible. Yes XFree86 comes with its own zlib which is built statically during the build process. Not sure how hard it would be to change over to a different zlib > >Some apps which I am aware that need zlib include:- > >python >rsync >tiff >png >gd >gimp >gsview >mysql >netpbm >openssh > Add glinks, timidity and I think CVS. Also I just downloaded the source (from hobbes) for PMVNC which also has its own zlib. Hard to build this as some files are built with Borland C and the makefiles are for Borland Make. > > >There is a comprehensive list here:- > >http://www.gzip.org/zlib/apps.gz.html > >but many of the apps don't mean anything to me. Yes quite a list, even Win98 install.exe. I also see zope at the bottom of the list. Dave **= Email 14 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:04:45 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: Zlib 1.2.1 On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:10:10 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > >I thought we had been over this a few times and a consensus had emerged, >although I admit most of it went over my head. I had hoped to create a DLL that allowed both import by name and ordinal but didn't have much luck. Actually I thought I had it working but it only worked in some cases. > > >> >It would be nice if the included configure script could be made to work... >> IIRC it does work for static linked libs, though only a.out. I don;t >> think we're ever really going to get configure scripts to create DLLs >> without a lot of work. So far I've had exactly one DLL built from a >> configure script and the next version of the app (libiconv) broke. > >Can't we use libtool to create DLL's? > >Alternatively having an OS/2 Makefile included in ZLIB, as used to be the >case, would be preferable, especially one which worked. Ideally would be one that creates both an import by ordinal and name, perhaps depending on what parameters are passed to the makefile. Anyways I hope to have more time after the end of the month and will get back to zlib (and png) Dave **= Email 15 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:00:35 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: Warpzilla Build Instructions On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:44:07 +0200, Andreas Buening wrote: >Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: >> Innotek GCC and EMX are not using exactly the same calling conventions >> for functions (i.e. they do use different registers/memory addresses >> to pass arguments/results in to/out of the function), so the best is >> to always use the same compiler for everything. > >Why? I thought the standard C calling convention was to pass >all arguments by the stack unless you specify some very special >optimization flag to use registers for this. Its funny, when I first heard about C (in the early '80s IIRC) on of the benefits was sopposed to be using registers for passing arguments compared to Pascal which used the stack. I see Watcom by default also uses registers unless you tell it otherwise Dave **= Email 16 ==========================** Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:32:27 +0200 From: Kris Steenhaut Subject: Re: (OT?) XFree86 mailing list status Dave Yeo schreef: >Hi Kris, have you seen any other messages, I sent a test message and John sent something too. > I did, I have. > Also are you subscribed to the digest or indivual messages? >Dave > > > To individual messages I am. Looking at your "to" field, if I were you, I would restrict it to just os2-unix at mail.warpix.org instead of os2-unix at mail.warpix.org Looks to me like some ISP are unduly diverting your messages into the High Nirvana due to the double. -- Groeten uit Gent, Kris **= Email 17 ==========================** Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:32:03 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: NCURSES 5.4 I've just tried building the latest version of NCURSES (5.4) and it fails with my standard build which worked fine for the previous two versions. Are there any required changes to the build environment for NCURSES? Here is the error I get:- make[1]: Entering directory `/ux2bs/workdir/ncurses-5.4/include' sh ./../mkinstalldirs t:/usr/include/ncurses mkdir t:/usr/include/ncurses installing term.h in t:/usr/include/ncurses installing curses.h in t:/usr/include/ncurses installing unctrl.h in t:/usr/include/ncurses installing termcap.h in t:/usr/include/ncurses installing ./ncurses_dll.h in t:/usr/include/ncurses make[1]: Leaving directory `/ux2bs/workdir/ncurses-5.4/include' cd ncurses && make DESTDIR="" install make[1]: Entering directory `/ux2bs/workdir/ncurses-5.4/ncurses' cd ../objects; gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../ncurses -I. -I. -I../include -D__ST_MT_ERRNO__ -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE -DNDEBUG -It:/usr/include/ncurses -Zmt -c ../ncurses/./tty/tty_update.c In file included from t:\ux2bs\posix2\include\unistd.h:232, from ..\ncurses\curses.priv.h:68, from ../ncurses/./tty/tty_update.c:45: t:\ux2bs\posix2\include\sys/unistdx.h:149: warning: `struct timeval' declared inside parameter list t:\ux2bs\posix2\include\sys/unistdx.h:149: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, t:\ux2bs\posix2\include\sys/unistdx.h:149: warning: which is probably not what you want. t:\ux2bs\posix2\include\sys/unistdx.h:149: warning: `struct _fd_set' declared inside parameter list In file included from ../ncurses/./tty/tty_update.c:70: t:\ux2bs\posix2\include\sys/select.h:26: `NBBY' undeclared here (not in a function) t:\ux2bs\posix2\include\sys/select.h:26: `NBBY' undeclared here (not in a function) t:\ux2bs\posix2\include\sys/select.h:26: size of array `fds_bits' has non-integer type t:\ux2bs\posix2\include\sys/select.h:43: conflicting types for `_select' t:\ux2bs\posix2\include\sys/unistdx.h:149: previous declaration of `_select' make[1]: *** [../objects/tty_update.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/ux2bs/workdir/ncurses-5.4/ncurses' make: *** [install] Error 2 -- John **= Email 18 ==========================** Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:56:36 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:28:59PM -0400, Henry Sobotka wrote: > John Poltorak wrote: > > > > Well it looks to have finished after many hours, not sure what to look for > > in the event of a successfull build... something like obj\mozilla.exe ? > > dist/bin/mozilla.exe which is built last in xpfe/bootstrap/. > > > In any event the build failed with errors... This is where things started > > to go wrong:- > > > [snip] > > > > Is this because the headers from the OS/2 Toolkit are missing? > > Yup. At /gfx, you're about a third of the way through. OK added the OS/2 Toolkit, now my latest sortie ended with this:- make.exe[4]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/lib' C:/MOZTOOLS/make.exe -C G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign MAKE="C:/MOZTOOLS/make.exe -j1" -j1 MOZILLA_INCLUDES="-IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/include/nspr -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/include/dbm" SOURCE_MD_DIR=G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist DIST=G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist MOZILLA_CLIENT=1 NO_MDUPDATE=1 BUILD_TREE=G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj NS_USE_GCC=1 NS_USE_NATIVE= make.exe[4]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign' cd mangle; C:/MOZTOOLS/make.exe -j1 export make.exe[5]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign/mangle' make.exe[5]: Nothing to be done for `export'. make.exe[5]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign/mangle' nsinstall -R -m 775 G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/nss/shlibsign.exe G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/bin cd mangle; C:/MOZTOOLS/make.exe -j1 libs make.exe[5]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign/mangle' gcc -o G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/nss/mangle.exe -Wall -W -Wno-unused -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Zomf -DDEBUG -DTRACING -g -DXP_PC=1 -DXP_OS2=1 -DSHLIB_SUFFIX=\"DLL\" -DSHLIB_PREFIX=\"\" -Uunix -U__unix -U__unix__ -DTCPV40HDRS -DDEBUG -D_DEBUG -DDEBUGPRINTS -DXP_OS2 -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/include -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/public/nss -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/private/nss -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/include -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/include/nspr -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/include/dbm G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/nss/mangle.o -DEBUG ..... ..... ..... G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/lib/dbm.lib -LG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/lib -lplc4 -lplds4 -lnspr4 nsinstall -R -m 775 G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/nss/mangle.exe G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/bin make.exe[5]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign/mangle' 1 +++ ?PARSE ARG dist objdir os_target therest?dist = forwardtoback(dist); make.exe[4]: *** [G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/lib/softokn3.chk] Error 255 make.exe[4]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign' make.exe[3]: *** [libs] Error 2 make.exe[3]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/security/manager' make.exe[2]: *** [tier_40] Error 2 make.exe[2]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' make.exe[1]: *** [default] Error 2 make.exe[1]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' make: *** [build] Error 2 Any ideas? > h~ -- John **= Email 19 ==========================** Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:01:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Dickey Subject: Re: NCURSES 5.4 On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, John Poltorak wrote: > > I've just tried building the latest version of NCURSES (5.4) and it fails > with my standard build which worked fine for the previous two versions. > Are there any required changes to the build environment for NCURSES? not really. There's something amiss with the configure script. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net **= Email 20 ==========================** Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:01:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Dickey Subject: Re: NCURSES 5.4 On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, John Poltorak wrote: > > I've just tried building the latest version of NCURSES (5.4) and it fails > with my standard build which worked fine for the previous two versions. > Are there any required changes to the build environment for NCURSES? not really. There's something amiss with the configure script. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net **= Email 21 ==========================** Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:59:16 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: NCURSES 5.4 On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 08:01:05AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, John Poltorak wrote: > There's something amiss with the configure script. The configure script was rebuilt from your configure.in using your patched version of v2.13 (20020210) AFAICT. Is there anything in particular I should look out for? > -- > Thomas E. Dickey > http://invisible-island.net > ftp://invisible-island.net -- John **= Email 22 ==========================** Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:16:34 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress John Poltorak wrote: > > `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign/mangle' > 1 +++ ?PARSE ARG dist objdir os_target therest?dist = > forwardtoback(dist); > make.exe[4]: *** [G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/dist/lib/softokn3.chk] > Error 255 This error appears to be coming from an attempt to run mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign/sign.cmd which is a REXX script for OS/2. "dist" is on the second line so my guess is you have an NL-terminated version of the file from the tarball (CVS does the conversion for the client), which may be making REXX barf. Try running sign.cmd through a NL->CRLF utility, or open and resave in a text editor that does the conversion. h~ **= Email 23 ==========================** Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 09:42:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Dickey Subject: Re: NCURSES 5.4 On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, John Poltorak wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 08:01:05AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, John Poltorak wrote: > > There's something amiss with the configure script. > > The configure script was rebuilt from your configure.in using your patched > version of v2.13 (20020210) AFAICT. > > Is there anything in particular I should look out for? It doesn't seem to have found the termio/termios headers and set the proper #define's. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net