Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:04:21 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 428 ************************************************** Monday 25 October 2004 Number 428 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Neil Waldhauer" 2 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : John Poltorak 3 Apps using ZLIB : John Poltorak 4 Re: GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de 5 Re: GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 : Yuri Dario" 6 Re: GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 : Henry Sobotka 1 Re: GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 : John Poltorak 2 ILINK : John Poltorak 7 Re: Apps using ZLIB : Dave Yeo" 8 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Neil Waldhauer" 3 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Henry Sobotka 4 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : John Poltorak 9 Re: ILINK : Henry Sobotka 10 nongnu.org : John Poltorak 5 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : John Poltorak 6 Re: Native port of OpenOffice...possible? : John Poltorak 11 Re: nongnu.org : Christian Hennecke" 12 Re: wxWindows, was:Native port of OpenOffice...possible? : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de 7 Re: ILINK : Dave Yeo" 13 Warpzilla build progress : John Poltorak 14 Re: Warpzilla build progress : Jeff Robinson 8 Re: Apps using ZLIB : John Poltorak 9 Re: Warpzilla build progress : Henry Sobotka 28 Re: Warpzilla build progress : John Poltorak 15 Re: Warpzilla build progress : John Poltorak **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 07:39:00 -0700 From: "Neil Waldhauer" Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:21:03 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > I hadn't been running gccenv previously so maybe the gcc environment > wasn't getting set up OK. Now I do get GNU C ... yes when running > configure, so some progress at least. > > Now for GLIB. OK, running gccenv also fixes the broken pipe problem for me. I checked the BEGINLIBPATH; it points to the directories with glib.dll and libidl.dll. Fortunately, I am running this on a fast machine, and the make takes only a minute or two to reach this failure. Neil -- Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com Nothing is foolproof to a talented fool. **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:16:30 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 07:39:00AM -0700, Neil Waldhauer wrote: > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:21:03 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > > > I hadn't been running gccenv previously so maybe the gcc environment > > wasn't getting set up OK. Now I do get GNU C ... yes when running > > configure, so some progress at least. > > > > Now for GLIB. > > OK, running gccenv also fixes the broken pipe problem for me. I checked the > BEGINLIBPATH; it points to the directories with glib.dll and libidl.dll. > > Fortunately, I am running this on a fast machine, and the make takes only a > minute or two to reach this failure. I've made some progress today - the GLIB and libIDL tests pass now and I get as far as generating a Makefile. Trouble is... I've changed so many things that I'm not sure which the critical changes were. Anyway I have managed to get configure running through to the end so may actually create mozilla.exe sometime in the next week... > Neil > -- > Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com > > Nothing is foolproof to a talented fool. -- John **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:05:34 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Apps using ZLIB Does anyone know if there is a definitive list of apps which use ZLIB? I'm trying to draw up a dependency list and ZLIB appears to be one of the most popular libs around. -- John **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:35:43 +0100 From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: Re: GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 Hi, > I've just put out GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 for every one to play > with. It's currently available at: > ftp://ftp.netlabs.org/pub/gcc/GCC-3.3.4-alpha2.zip Just wanted to say that I found some time to give it a quick check today, and while current wxWindows builds just fine with it, it has socket support disabled, since configure fails on something essentially like this: [G:\wxWidgets\build\pm-new]type main.c main(){ socket(); } So. 24.10.2004 18.34.39 Uhr [G:\wxWidgets\build\pm-new]gcc -o main.exe main.c -lsocket J:/gcc-3.3/usr/lib/libsocket.a(socket.o): Undefined symbol "___libc_timebomb" re ferenced Regards, Stefan cc: os2-unix at mail.warpix.org **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:06:07 +0200 (CDT) From: "Yuri Dario" Subject: Re: GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 Hi, >J:/gcc-3.3/usr/lib/libsocket.a(socket.o): Undefined symbol "___libc_timebomb" re get new socket&syslog libraries from netlabs pub/incoming. Bye, Yuri Dario /* * member of TeamOS/2 - Italy * http://www.os2power.com/yuri * http://www.teamos2.it */ **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:13:39 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > > So. 24.10.2004 18.34.39 Uhr > [G:\wxWidgets\build\pm-new]gcc -o main.exe main.c -lsocket > J:/gcc-3.3/usr/lib/libsocket.a(socket.o): Undefined symbol "___libc_timebomb" re > ferenced Try adding -lgcc; that may be where the timebomb is planted. h~ **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:37:15 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: GCC 3.3.4 / LIBC 0.6 Alpha 2 On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 07:06:07PM +0200, Yuri Dario wrote: > Hi, > > >J:/gcc-3.3/usr/lib/libsocket.a(socket.o): Undefined symbol "___libc_timebomb" re > > > get new socket&syslog libraries from netlabs pub/incoming. Actually, it's:- ftp://ftp.netlabs.org/incoming/libc06a2-libsocket.zip ftp://ftp.netlabs.org/incoming/libc06a2-libsyslog.zip > > Bye, > > Yuri Dario > > /* > * member of TeamOS/2 - Italy > * http://www.os2power.com/yuri > * http://www.teamos2.it > */ -- John **= Email 7 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:37:20 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: Apps using ZLIB On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:05:34 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > >Does anyone know if there is a definitive list of apps which use ZLIB? That would be one huge list > >I'm trying to draw up a dependency list and ZLIB appears to be one of the >most popular libs around. Basically anything using compression or anything using graphics as libpng and libtiff uses zlib. Of the top of my head, Mozilla (mozilla can be built using local libs or included libs), XFree86 (comes with its own zlib), the Gimp, Links, lots of gtk programs and I'm sure quite a few others Dave **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:42:04 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: ILINK It looks as though IBM's ILINK is required to build Mozilla. Are there any copyright issues in distibuting it? Why do we use ILINK instead of a gcc program? -- John **= Email 8 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 10:37:59 -0700 From: "Neil Waldhauer" Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:16:30 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > I've made some progress today - the GLIB and libIDL tests pass now What did you do to get them to pass? I'm still stuck on them. Neil -- Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com When I'm not in my right mind, my left mind gets pretty crowded. **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 13:34:15 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build Neil Waldhauer wrote: > > OK, running gccenv also fixes the broken pipe problem for me. I checked the > BEGINLIBPATH; it points to the directories with glib.dll and libidl.dll. > > Fortunately, I am running this on a fast machine, and the make takes only a > minute or two to reach this failure. If you're still getting the GLIB/IDL failure, what does config.log show? Does the output of "echo %GLIB%" and "echo %LIBIDL%" (after running setmozenv.cmd) match your system? h~ **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:23:04 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:37:59AM -0700, Neil Waldhauer wrote: > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 16:16:30 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > > > I've made some progress today - the GLIB and libIDL tests pass now > > What did you do to get them to pass? I'm still stuck on them. I've made a number of changes but guarantee which has made the difference. Among those changes:- setmozenv.cmd changed references in the shell settings from ash.exe to sh.exe added sh.exe (from pdksh) to moztools commented out set glib_config and se libidl_config glib-config and libidl-config (under glibidl\...\gcc\bin) changed first line to sh from ash There may also have been some other changes, which I've forgotten. > Neil > -- > Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com > > When I'm not in my right mind, my left mind gets pretty crowded. -- John **= Email 9 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:10:11 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: ILINK John Poltorak wrote: > > Why do we use ILINK instead of a gcc program? Because it's more advanced than link386 which gcc uses by default for linkage with -Zomf. h~ **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:10:59 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 07:23:04PM +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > Among those changes:- > > setmozenv.cmd > > changed references in the shell settings from ash.exe to sh.exe > added sh.exe (from pdksh) to moztools > commented out set glib_config and se libidl_config Forget all that - I just restored the original setmozenv.cmd and it still works. I've also restored the glibidl archive which sounds as though I have undone all the changes made and it still works. So.... I'm none the wiser as to why it works now and didn't before. -- John **= Email 10 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:02:58 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: nongnu.org If we ever manage to port the whole GNU catalog to OS/2, maybe we can start on nongnu :-)... I just came across nongnu.org which says it hosts 1800 nongnu projects. Not sure how many would be useful to us on OS/2, but there must be one or two. Is this one of any use to developers:- ? http://www.nongnu.org/glibc-bsd/ I also came across another directory of Free Software here:- http://directory.fsf.org/ This lists 3,615 packages, so we may be quite busy for a few years ;-). -- John **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 22:18:03 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Native port of OpenOffice...possible? On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 12:01:00AM +0100, Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > Hi, > > > It might be worth reminding people that a new release (2.5.3) of wxWidgets > > - the new name for wxWindows, has just been released from:- > > > > http://www.wxwindows.org/ > > > > > > I had problems trying to get the last release to build and the updated > > OS/2 branch didn't seem to be included in the official release. Has that > > changed with this release? > > If you run "./configure --disable-shared", make should succeed - and > it did for me even with 2.5.2. I don't remember any more which > problems you had with the older version, though... My problem was with knowing which package to grab... Am I wrong in thinking that wxBase should have an os2 directory under include\wx ? The generated Makefiles assumes that there is one. > Regards, > Stefan -- John **= Email 11 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 22:56:51 +0200 (CEST) From: "Christian Hennecke" Subject: Re: nongnu.org On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:02:58 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: >If we ever manage to port the whole GNU catalog to OS/2, maybe we can >start on nongnu :-)... > >I just came across nongnu.org which says it hosts 1800 nongnu projects. > >Not sure how many would be useful to us on OS/2, but there must be one or >two. Especially this one: http://www.nongnu.org/enigma OS/2 needs more fun! :-) Christian Hennecke **= Email 12 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:03:14 +0100 From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: Re: wxWindows, was:Native port of OpenOffice...possible? Hi, > My problem was with knowing which package to grab... Am I wrong in > thinking that wxBase should have an os2 directory under include\wx ? Ideally, it should, yes. But anyway, feel free to just ignore wxBase and just get either wxOS2 or wxAll (both containing wxBase anyway). Regards, Stefan **= Email 7 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:31:10 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: ILINK On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:42:04 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: >It looks as though IBM's ILINK is required to build Mozilla. > >Are there any copyright issues in distibuting it? Best bet would be a wget script to download it from ftp.mozilla.org Dave **= Email 13 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:40:10 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Warpzilla build progress After getting Mozilla's configure to run through properly the OBJ dir has become well populated, predominantly with Makefiles in dozens of directories. Then I get dozens of errors like this:- checking for pthread_create in -lc_r... no checking for pthread_create in -lc... no updating cache .././config.cache creating ./config.status creating Makefile sed: can't read G: No such file or directory sed: can't read G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/nsprpub//ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/nsprpub/Makefile.in: No such file or directory creating config/Makefile sed: can't read G: No such file or directory sed: can't read G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/nsprpub//ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/nsprpub/config/Makefile.in: No such file or directory creating config/autoconf.mk sed: can't read G: No such file or directory sed: can't read G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/nsprpub//ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/nsprpub/config/autoconf.mk.in: No such file or directory creating config/nsprincl.mk .... Eventually the process ends with this:- sed: can't read G: No such file or directory sed: can't read G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/directory/c-sdk//ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/libraries/libssldap/Makefile.in: No such file or directory make.exe -C G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj make.exe[1]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' make.exe[1]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' make.exe[1]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' rm -f -rf ./dist/sdk C:/MOZTOOLS/make.exe -C config export make.exe[2]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/config' rm -f nfspwd cp G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/nfspwd.pl nfspwd chmod +x nfspwd rm -f revdepth cp G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/revdepth.pl revdepth chmod +x revdepth C:/PERL/bin/5.8.0/perl.exe -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/bdate.pl build_number rm -f nsBuildID.h C:/PERL/bin/5.8.0/perl.exe -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/aboutime.pl -m G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/milestone.txt nsBuildID.h build_number G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/nsBuildID.h.in C:/MOZTOOLS/nsinstall -m 644 nsBuildID.h ../mozilla-config.h .../dist/include C:/PERL/bin/5.8.0/perl.exe -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/build-list.pl ../dist/include/.headerlist nsBuildID.h ../mozilla-config.h rm -f ../config/final-link-comps ../config/final-link-libs .../config/final-link-comp-names rm -f ../dist/bin/chrome/chromelist.txt C:/MOZTOOLS/nsinstall -t -m 644 nsBuildID.h ../mozilla-config.h .../dist/sdk/include make.exe[2]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/config' C:/MOZTOOLS/make.exe nspr make.exe[2]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' C:/MOZTOOLS/make.exe -C nsprpub make.exe[3]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/nsprpub' make.exe[3]: *** No targets. Stop. make.exe[3]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/nsprpub' make.exe[2]: *** [nspr] Error 2 make.exe[2]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' make.exe[1]: *** [default] Error 2 make.exe[1]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' make: *** [build] Error 2 My build environment consists of moztools, perl, glibidl, autoconf on C:, gcc 3.2.2 on D: and the mozilla source in G:\ux2bs\workdir\mozilla Any suggestions as to why SED is complaining? SED v4.0.5 is being used. -- John **= Email 14 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 07:01:45 -0500 From: Jeff Robinson Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress John Poltorak wrote: > > After getting Mozilla's configure to run through properly the OBJ dir has > become well populated, predominantly with Makefiles in dozens of > directories. Then I get dozens of errors like this:- > > checking for pthread_create in -lc_r... no > checking for pthread_create in -lc... no > updating cache .././config.cache > creating ./config.status > creating Makefile > sed: can't read G: No such file or directory > sed: can't read G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/nsprpub//ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/nsprpub/Makefile.in: > No such file or directory > creating config/Makefile > sed: can't read G: No such file or directory > sed: can't read G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/nsprpub//ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/nsprpub/config/Makefile.in: > No such file or directory > creating config/autoconf.mk > sed: can't read G: No such file or directory > sed: can't read G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/nsprpub//ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/nsprpub/config/autoconf.mk.in: > No such file or directory > creating config/nsprincl.mk > > ... > > Eventually the process ends with this:- > > sed: can't read G: No such file or directory > sed: can't read > G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/directory/c-sdk//ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/directory/c-sdk/ldap/libraries/libssldap/Makefile.in: > No such file or directory > make.exe -C G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj > make.exe[1]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' > make.exe[1]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' > make.exe[1]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' > rm -f -rf ./dist/sdk > C:/MOZTOOLS/make.exe -C config export > make.exe[2]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/config' > rm -f nfspwd > cp G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/nfspwd.pl nfspwd > chmod +x nfspwd > rm -f revdepth > cp G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/revdepth.pl revdepth > chmod +x revdepth > C:/PERL/bin/5.8.0/perl.exe -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config > G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/bdate.pl build_number > rm -f nsBuildID.h > C:/PERL/bin/5.8.0/perl.exe -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config > G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/aboutime.pl -m > G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/milestone.txt nsBuildID.h build_number > G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/nsBuildID.h.in > C:/MOZTOOLS/nsinstall -m 644 nsBuildID.h ../mozilla-config.h > ../dist/include > C:/PERL/bin/5.8.0/perl.exe -IG:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config > G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/config/build-list.pl ../dist/include/.headerlist > nsBuildID.h ../mozilla-config.h > rm -f ../config/final-link-comps ../config/final-link-libs > ../config/final-link-comp-names > rm -f ../dist/bin/chrome/chromelist.txt > C:/MOZTOOLS/nsinstall -t -m 644 nsBuildID.h ../mozilla-config.h > ../dist/sdk/include > make.exe[2]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/config' > C:/MOZTOOLS/make.exe nspr > make.exe[2]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' > C:/MOZTOOLS/make.exe -C nsprpub > make.exe[3]: Entering directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/nsprpub' > make.exe[3]: *** No targets. Stop. > make.exe[3]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj/nsprpub' > make.exe[2]: *** [nspr] Error 2 > make.exe[2]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' > make.exe[1]: *** [default] Error 2 > make.exe[1]: Leaving directory `G:/ux2bs/workdir/mozilla/obj' > make: *** [build] Error 2 > > > > My build environment consists of moztools, perl, glibidl, autoconf on C:, > gcc 3.2.2 on D: and the mozilla source in G:\ux2bs\workdir\mozilla > > Any suggestions as to why SED is complaining? SED v4.0.5 is being used. > > I seem to recall this might have been an issue with the wrong "pwd" command... one of them doesn't put the back-slash on. What the trick might've come down to was that even though you have the correct "pwd" on your system, your shell may have a built-in pwd that is returning the wrong string. Of course, it's been quite a while since I've tried to build Mozilla, but a search of the newsgroups may turn up the same thread. Jeff -- ---------------- Whatza JamochaMUD? http://jamochamud.anecho.mb.ca Or other stuff: http://www.anecho.mb.ca/~jeffnik ----------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 8 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:57:48 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Apps using ZLIB On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 10:37:20AM -0800, Dave Yeo wrote: > On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:05:34 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > > > > >Does anyone know if there is a definitive list of apps which use ZLIB? > > That would be one huge list Possibly so, but I would like to know which apps to rebuild when a new version of ZLIB becomes available. > >I'm trying to draw up a dependency list and ZLIB appears to be one of the > >most popular libs around. > > Basically anything using compression or anything using graphics as > libpng and libtiff uses zlib. Of the top of my head, Mozilla (mozilla > can be built using local libs or included libs), XFree86 (comes with > its own zlib), the Gimp, Links, lots of gtk programs and I'm sure quite > a few others Does XFree86 need its own version of ZLIB? I'd really like to elminate as much redundancy as possible. Some apps which I am aware that need zlib include:- python rsync tiff png gd gimp gsview mysql netpbm openssh There is a comprehensive list here:- http://www.gzip.org/zlib/apps.gz.html but many of the apps don't mean anything to me. > Dave > -- John **= Email 9 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:30:18 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress Did you delete mozilla/nsprpub/configure and mozilla/directory/c-sdk/configure? You might also want to run autoconf manually there to make sure the right one is called. h~ **= Email 28 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:28:40 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 07:01:45AM -0500, Jeff Robinson wrote: > I seem to recall this might have been an issue with the wrong "pwd" > command... one of them doesn't put the back-slash on. What the trick > might've come down to was that even though you have the correct "pwd" on > your system, your shell may have a built-in pwd that is returning the > wrong string. How do I confirm that this pwd problem is the cause of the errors? > Of course, it's been quite a while since I've tried to build Mozilla, > but a search of the newsgroups may turn up the same thread. I've only managed to search newsgroups via google groups. Are the Netscape groups available? If I want to continue the build without recreating the Makefiles through configure, do I just run:- ? make -f client.mk > Jeff > > -- > ---------------- > Whatza JamochaMUD? > http://jamochamud.anecho.mb.ca > > Or other stuff: http://www.anecho.mb.ca/~jeffnik > ----------------------------------------------------------- -- John **= Email 15 ==========================** Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 13:28:40 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Warpzilla build progress On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 07:01:45AM -0500, Jeff Robinson wrote: > I seem to recall this might have been an issue with the wrong "pwd" > command... one of them doesn't put the back-slash on. What the trick > might've come down to was that even though you have the correct "pwd" on > your system, your shell may have a built-in pwd that is returning the > wrong string. How do I confirm that this pwd problem is the cause of the errors? > Of course, it's been quite a while since I've tried to build Mozilla, > but a search of the newsgroups may turn up the same thread. I've only managed to search newsgroups via google groups. Are the Netscape groups available? If I want to continue the build without recreating the Makefiles through configure, do I just run:- ? make -f client.mk > Jeff > > -- > ---------------- > Whatza JamochaMUD? > http://jamochamud.anecho.mb.ca > > Or other stuff: http://www.anecho.mb.ca/~jeffnik > ----------------------------------------------------------- -- John