Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:04:19 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 427 ************************************************** Sunday 24 October 2004 Number 427 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Building UNZIP : John Poltorak 2 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Neil Waldhauer" 3 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : John Poltorak 4 Re: Native port of OpenOffice...possible? : Kris Steenhaut 5 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Dave Yeo" 6 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : John Poltorak 7 Glib and Warpzilla build : John Poltorak 8 Re: Glib and Warpzilla build : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:00:21 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Building UNZIP On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 01:04:35PM +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > > Has anyone tried building Info-ZIPs UNZIP from source? > > I've found that it won't build using Make v3.79, although it is OK with > 3.76 and 3.81. On further testing, it looks like Make v3.79 does work, as long as you set MAKESHELL=/bin/sh first. -- John **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 08:11:57 -0700 From: "Neil Waldhauer" Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:28:35 -0400, Henry Sobotka wrote: > Run "gcc -save-temps". If you see: > > gcc: Warning: -pipe ignored since -save-temps specified No, it just compiles my program. > > you probably have that GCCOPT set in config.sys. In Mozilla, IIRC -pipe > is among the default CFLAGS. Try setting CFLAGS=-save-temps before > running configure. That forces disk IO instead of piping. I did set CFLAGS=-save-temps before make -f client.mk build and I get the same result regarding SIGPIPE. Is there a better way to specify the CFLAGS? I'm using cmd.exe for my command processor. Neil -- Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com Enter any 11-digit prime number to continue . . . **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:04:05 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 08:11:57AM -0700, Neil Waldhauer wrote: > and I get the same result regarding SIGPIPE. Is there a better way to specify > the CFLAGS? I'm using cmd.exe for my command processor. I tried using my standard UX2BS - after adjusting for AUTOCONF and got the correct response from configure as far using GNU C was concerned. It does look as though it is a gcc 3.2.2 configuration problem. I may try installing it manually or even giving 3.3.4 a try... > Neil > -- > Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com > > Enter any 11-digit prime number to continue . . . -- John **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:09:01 +0200 From: Kris Steenhaut Subject: Re: Native port of OpenOffice...possible? Antonio Manara Rossini schreef: >On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:34:53 +0200 (CEST), Mentore Siesto wrote: > > > >>KS >billn schreef: >>KS > >>KS >>This would be useful enough to me that I would be willing to spend time >>KS >>and effort on it. >>KS >> >>KS >So I'm I. Effort meaning prepared to donate an certain amount of euro. >>KS >Incidentally, I still have a list of people prepared to pay a real (or >>KS >almost real) native OOo would see the light. >>KS >So, if it would turn into doable reality, do send me a note. >> >>Add me to the list. >> >> > >Add me too! > > Done. -- Groeten uit Gent, Kris **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:49:47 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:04:05 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > >I tried using my standard UX2BS - after adjusting for AUTOCONF and got the >correct response from configure as far using GNU C was concerned. > >It does look as though it is a gcc 3.2.2 configuration problem. > >I may try installing it manually or even giving 3.3.4 a try... It wasn't until the second try that gcc 3.2.2 worked correctly here. I also have a simple script in my path which has H:\gcc322\bin\gccenv h:\gcc322 Where gcc322 is installed to h:gcc322 Dave ps first problem was a total inability to compile OMF, a.out worked fine **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:21:03 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 05:49:47PM -0800, Dave Yeo wrote: > On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:04:05 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > > > > >I tried using my standard UX2BS - after adjusting for AUTOCONF and got the > >correct response from configure as far using GNU C was concerned. > > > >It does look as though it is a gcc 3.2.2 configuration problem. > > > >I may try installing it manually or even giving 3.3.4 a try... > > It wasn't until the second try that gcc 3.2.2 worked correctly here. I also have a simple script in my path which has > H:\gcc322\bin\gccenv h:\gcc322 > Where gcc322 is installed to h:gcc322 > Dave > ps first problem was a total inability to compile OMF, a.out worked fine I hadn't been running gccenv previously so maybe the gcc environment wasn't getting set up OK. Now I do get GNU C ... yes when running configure, so some progress at least. Now for GLIB. -- John **= Email 7 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:28:04 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Glib and Warpzilla build I'm not sure what is going wrong with glib whilst building Warpzilla, but the test for glib always fails (as does the test for libidl). One of the problems I have with these test is that they are only made after configure has been running for around 10 mins. Is there any way to get those tests to run in isolation? And what tests are the exactly? sh glib-config --version works OK from the command line. -- John **= Email 8 ==========================** Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:10:21 +0100 From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: Re: Glib and Warpzilla build Hi, > One of the problems I have with these test is that they are only made > after configure has been running for around 10 mins. > > Is there any way to get those tests to run in isolation? And what tests > are the exactly? sh glib-config --version works OK from the command line. Looking at config.log might help. sinve glib-config --version is OK, I suppose configure is compiling and running a sample program and either can't find some include file that it needs, or can't find some library when linking or can't find a DLL when trying to run things. Maybe adding "glib\lib" or whatever the directory is exactly to BEGINLIBPATH does help? Regards, Stefan