Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:04:22 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 426 ************************************************** Saturday 23 October 2004 Number 426 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Autoconf : John Poltorak 2 Re: XFreeOS2 list gone? : Dave Yeo" 3 Re: XFreeOS2 list gone? : Dave Yeo" 4 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : John Poltorak 5 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Neil Waldhauer" 6 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : John Poltorak 7 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Henry Sobotka 8 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Neil Waldhauer" 9 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : John Poltorak 10 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Henry Sobotka 11 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Henry Sobotka 12 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Neil Waldhauer" 13 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Henry Sobotka 14 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Neil Waldhauer" 15 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : Henry Sobotka 16 Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build : mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) 17 Re: XFreeOS2 list gone? : Dave Yeo" 18 Re: Native port of OpenOffice...possible? : Antonio Manara Rossini" 19 Building GLIB (1.2.1) : John Poltorak 20 Building UNZIP : John Poltorak **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:41:03 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Autoconf On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 12:56:05PM +0200, Andreas Buening wrote: > John Poltorak wrote: > > > > Is the latest autoconf (v2.59) completely functional under OS/2? > > I recommend to use the latest patches I provided for 2.59. It looks like I have them but I couldn't remember where they came from. I guess this is the latest release:- http://unix.os2site.com/sw/pub/source/autoconf/autoconf-2_59-r2.zip > But IIRC it was mostly working without them. It seems to work OK, but I've just come across this problem with GNU MP:- gmp-4.1.4 Using:- autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59 (release 2 for OS/2) SYS0003: The system cannot find the path specified. SYS0003: The system cannot find the path specified. SYS0003: The system cannot find the path specified. configure.in:58: g:/ux2bs/bin/m4: Bad expression in eval: > 0 autom4te: g:/ux2bs/bin/m4.exe failed with exit status: 1 ../configure How do I tell what is causing this? Here is the source tarball I used:- ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/gnu/gmp/gmp-4.1.4.tar.gz . > > Bye, > Andreas -- John **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:45:44 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: XFreeOS2 list gone? On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:42:13 +0200 (CEST), Christian Hennecke wrote: >On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:09:05 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > >>I just tried posting a msg to the XFreeOS/2 list and got this:- >> >>... while talking to mail-ext1.ais.fraunhofer.de.: >>>>> RCPT To:^M >> >><<< 553 5.3.0 ... No such user here >>550 ... User unknown >> >>Anyone know anything about the list or who subscribed? > >Me, for instance. > >I just tried to access Holger's "temporary" homepage at >xfree86os2.dyndns.org and got a "Forbidden" message. I'm also getting forbidden messages and cgi errors though I see my last message (which only Kris appears to have recieved) is still there at http://xfreeos2.dyndns.org/pipermail/xfreeos2/2004-October/000436.html. Hopefully Holgers just on vacation and something crashed. The XFreeos2 info page is still there as well http://xfreeos2.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/xfreeos2 Dave **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:59:34 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: XFreeOS2 list gone? On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:09:05 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: >Anyone know anything about the list or who subscribed? > >We need to get it back up and running. I sent Holger an email about the problems, hasn't bounced back yet so hopefully he'll get it Dave **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:34:22 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 07:57:37PM -0700, Neil Waldhauer wrote: > On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:20:36 -0400, Henry Sobotka wrote: > > > You're definitely running the right configure. > > > > Do you see those defines in confdefs.h? > > I don't. I was with you and John, each step of the way. I've got the same > contents in my configure. Do you also get something like this in your config.log? configure:899: checking for EMX/OS2 environment configure:912: gcc -c conftest.c 1>&5 configure:943: checking for executable suffix configure:1021: checking host system type configure:1042: checking target system type configure:1060: checking build system type configure:2078: checking for gcc configure:2195: checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works configure:2211: gcc -o conftest.exe conftest.c 1>&5 configure:2237: checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) is a cross-compiler configure:2242: checking whether we are using GNU C configure:2251: gcc -E conftest.c C:/gcc322/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-os2-emx/3.2.2/cpp0.exe: Process terminated by SIGPIPE configure:2270: checking whether gcc accepts -g configure:2306: checking for c++ configure:2339: checking whether the C++ compiler (g++ ) works configure:2355: g++ -o conftest.exe conftest.C 1>&5 configure:2381: checking whether the C++ compiler (g++ ) is a cross-compiler configure:2386: checking whether we are using GNU C++ configure:2395: g++ -E conftest.C C:/gcc322/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-os2-emx/3.2.2/cpp0.exe: Process terminated by SIGPIPE It looks like cpp0.exe isn't running properly - don't know why - nothing in POPUPLOG.OS2... BTW OS2_SHELL = c:\os2\cmd.exe > Neil > -- > Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com > > Jews for Jesus... and also for pissing off one's parents, even if they weren't religious, in a way that the Hare Krisnas can't even begin to imagine. -- John **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 10:04:33 -0700 From: "Neil Waldhauer" Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:34:22 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > C:/gcc322/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-os2-emx/3.2.2/cpp0.exe: > Process terminated by SIGPIPE > > > It looks like cpp0.exe isn't running properly - don't know why - nothing > in POPUPLOG.OS2... This is true for me as well... > configure:2387: checking whether gcc accepts -g > configure:2423: checking for c++ > configure:2456: checking whether the C++ compiler (g++ ) works > configure:2482: g++ -o conftest.exe conftest.C 1>&5 > configure:2512: checking whether the C++ compiler (g++ ) is a cross-compiler > configure:2517: checking whether we are using GNU C++ > configure:2526: g++ -E conftest.C > > M:/gcc322/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-os2-emx/3.2.2/cpp0.exe: > Process terminated by SIGPIPE Neil -- Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com The greater the task to be done, the more insignificant the work which must precede it. **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:50:38 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 10:04:33AM -0700, Neil Waldhauer wrote: > On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:34:22 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > > > C:/gcc322/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-os2-emx/3.2.2/cpp0.exe: > > Process terminated by SIGPIPE > > > > > > It looks like cpp0.exe isn't running properly - don't know why - nothing > > in POPUPLOG.OS2... > > This is true for me as well... I just tried running cpp0.exe from the command line and it complains about not finding IINTL6I... Where should I expect to find this? > Neil > -- > Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com > > The greater the task to be done, the more insignificant the work which must precede it. -- John **= Email 7 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:13:56 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build John Poltorak wrote: > > I just tried running cpp0.exe from the command line and it complains about > not finding IINTL6I... Where should I expect to find this? The name suggests it's Innotek's version of the infamous intl.dll, so I would expect it to be in your gcc 3.2.2 tree. Did you run gccenv.cmd (or whatever it is exactly) before testing cpp0.exe? h~ **= Email 8 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 12:54:34 -0700 From: "Neil Waldhauer" Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:50:38 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > I just tried running cpp0.exe from the command line and it complains about > not finding IINTL6I... Where should I expect to find this? That's not what I see. If I run M:/gcc322/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-os2-emx/3.2.2/cpp0.exe from the command line, it just hangs there until I hit control C. Neil -- Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com Forgive your enemies. It messes with their heads. **= Email 9 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:13:19 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 12:54:34PM -0700, Neil Waldhauer wrote: > On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:50:38 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > > > I just tried running cpp0.exe from the command line and it complains about > > not finding IINTL6I... Where should I expect to find this? > > That's not what I see. If I run > M:/gcc322/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-os2-emx/3.2.2/cpp0.exe from the command line, it > just hangs there until I hit control C. If you have EMXLOAD running, stop it and try it again. Not sure if any of this is relevant, put it seems like a GCC setup problem. Henry: I did try running gccenv.cmd (which isn't mentioned on the gccsetup page) but that didn't have the desired affect. If I use my standard gcc 2.8.1 setup, I get the correct options out of configure, so it points to something in gcc 3.2.2 not being configured correctly. Wonder if there is any way of turning on verbose output from gcc... > Neil > -- > Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com > > Forgive your enemies. It messes with their heads. -- John **= Email 10 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:14:58 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build Neil Waldhauer wrote: > > That's not what I see. If I run > M:/gcc322/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-os2-emx/3.2.2/cpp0.exe from the command line, it > just hangs there until I hit control C. It's just drooling for input. Feed it a .h or .c file, and try the same with gcc -E to see if the pipe always breaks, or just with mozilla. h~ **= Email 11 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:25:50 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build John Poltorak wrote: > > If I use my standard gcc 2.8.1 setup, I get the correct options out of > configure, so it points to something in gcc 3.2.2 not being configured > correctly. Wonder if there is any way of turning on verbose output from > gcc... Does the 2.8.1 run get past the GLIB/IDL break? (to see if we're dealing with one problem or two problems) gcc verbosity can show where it's looking for stuff, and there's --save-temps, but that wouldn't help figure out why the pipe is broken. What happens if you REM out the GCCOPT=-pipe in setmozenv.cmd? h~ **= Email 12 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:40:29 -0700 From: "Neil Waldhauer" Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:14:58 -0400, Henry Sobotka wrote: > Neil Waldhauer wrote: > > > > That's not what I see. If I run > > M:/gcc322/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-os2-emx/3.2.2/cpp0.exe from the command line, it > > just hangs there until I hit control C. > > It's just drooling for input. Feed it a .h or .c file, and try the same > with gcc -E to see if the pipe always breaks, or just with mozilla. [M:\builds\helloworld\mozilla\obj]gcc -E gcc: no input files, try "gcc --help" Looks like it's just with mozilla. Neil -- Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com Buckle Up: It makes it harder for the aliens to suck you out of your car. **= Email 13 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:58:43 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build Neil Waldhauer wrote: > > [M:\builds\helloworld\mozilla\obj]gcc -E > gcc: no input files, try "gcc --help" > > Looks like it's just with mozilla. That message is likely coming from just parsing options, i.e. it's dying before going to work. Try "gcc -E foo.c" (with a valid foo.c in the current directory). h~ **= Email 14 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 14:56:39 -0700 From: "Neil Waldhauer" Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:25:50 -0400, Henry Sobotka wrote: > John Poltorak wrote: > > > > If I use my standard gcc 2.8.1 setup, I get the correct options out of > > configure, so it points to something in gcc 3.2.2 not being configured > > correctly. Wonder if there is any way of turning on verbose output from > > gcc... > > Does the 2.8.1 run get past the GLIB/IDL break? (to see if we're dealing > with one problem or two problems) > > gcc verbosity can show where it's looking for stuff, and there's > --save-temps, but that wouldn't help figure out why the pipe is broken. > > What happens if you REM out the GCCOPT=-pipe in setmozenv.cmd? If I rem out GCCOPT in setmozenv.cmd, I still get configure:2387: checking whether gcc accepts -g configure:2423: checking for c++ configure:2456: checking whether the C++ compiler (g++ ) works configure:2482: g++ -o conftest.exe conftest.C 1>&5 configure:2512: checking whether the C++ compiler (g++ ) is a cross-compiler configure:2517: checking whether we are using GNU C++ configure:2526: g++ -E conftest.C M:/gcc322/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-os2-emx/3.2.2/cpp0.exe: Process terminated by SIGPIPE Neil -- Neil Waldhauer, neil at blondeguy.com Brain cells come and brain cells go, but fat cells live forever. **= Email 15 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:28:35 -0400 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build Neil Waldhauer wrote: > > If I rem out GCCOPT in setmozenv.cmd, I still get > > > M:/gcc322/lib/gcc-lib/i386-pc-os2-emx/3.2.2/cpp0.exe: > Process terminated by SIGPIPE Run "gcc -save-temps". If you see: gcc: Warning: -pipe ignored since -save-temps specified you probably have that GCCOPT set in config.sys. In Mozilla, IIRC -pipe is among the default CFLAGS. Try setting CFLAGS=-save-temps before running configure. That forces disk IO instead of piping. h~ **= Email 16 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:54:37 -0500 From: mikus at bga.com (Mikus Grinbergs) Subject: Re: No config.log with Warpzilla build On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:50:38 +0100 John Poltorak wrote: > > I just tried running cpp0.exe from the command line and it complains about > not finding IINTL6I... Where should I expect to find this? For me, it was installed by GCC 3.2.2 (perhaps by the beta) : Directory of D:\gc3\lib 10-06-03 11:25p 146715 0 opcode2b.dll 2-23-04 3:40p 28718 0 gcc322.dll 2-23-04 3:42p 69646 0 opcode2e.dll 2-23-04 3:42p 475146 0 bfd2e.dll 4-07-04 10:03p 65536 0 innidm.dll 4-08-04 1:20a 35784 0 iintl6i.dll 4-14-04 4:37p 356330 0 libc05.dll 7 file(s) 1177875 bytes used mikus **= Email 17 ==========================** Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:50:15 -0800 From: "Dave Yeo" Subject: Re: XFreeOS2 list gone? On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:59:34 -0800, Dave Yeo wrote: >I sent Holger an email about the problems, hasn't bounced back yet so hopefully he'll get it Holger said they've made some mods on their mail system and will look into it. BTW I posted a test message today and it never bounced, just seems to of vanished. John the address I have for the XFree86/2 list is xfreeos2 at xfreeos2.dyndns.org not xfreeos2 at citytraffic.de Dave **= Email 18 ==========================** Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:50:43 +0200 (CDT) From: "Antonio Manara Rossini" Subject: Re: Native port of OpenOffice...possible? On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:34:53 +0200 (CEST), Mentore Siesto wrote: >KS >billn schreef: >KS > >KS >>This would be useful enough to me that I would be willing to spend time >KS >>and effort on it. >KS >> >KS >So I'm I. Effort meaning prepared to donate an certain amount of euro. >KS >Incidentally, I still have a list of people prepared to pay a real (or >KS >almost real) native OOo would see the light. >KS >So, if it would turn into doable reality, do send me a note. > >Add me to the list. Add me too! - - - Antonio Manara Rossini Quality Manager & CEO at www.manaracostruzioni.it WSiTE: www.vrglabs.com - iCQ: 14586599 PGP 5.0i key available. || My best view from a Window was through OS/2. || **= Email 19 ==========================** Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:44:30 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Building GLIB (1.2.1) What's involved in building GLIB from the distributed source? Does it need any OS/2 patches? -- John **= Email 20 ==========================** Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 13:04:35 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Building UNZIP Has anyone tried building Info-ZIPs UNZIP from source? I've found that it won't build using Make v3.79, although it is OK with 3.76 and 3.81. Can anyone confirm that? -- John