Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 00:04:20 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 372 ************************************************** Friday 07 May 2004 Number 372 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: distcc : John Poltorak 2 Re: OpenOffice : Andreas Buening 3 Re: Re: Building EMACS v20.7 : John Poltorak 4 OOO_1_1_1 and Innotek : Alex Newman" 5 Re: OOO_1_1_1 and Innotek : Steve Wendt 6 Re: distcc : Stefan.Neis at t-online.de **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 14:53:39 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: distcc On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:55:38PM +0200, Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > But whatever the result, I have some doubts > that you really can get something generating > code suitable for OS/2 from it. I have my doubts that it would work too, although I just don't see how it could work anywhere without a great deal of configuration, which, according to the docs, it doesn't need. > AFAIK, Innotek's changes have not been > integrated > into standard gcc distribution, or have they? I'm bot aware that distcc has any specific requirements in gcc? > > Regards, > Stefan -- John **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 20:17:35 +0200 From: Andreas Buening Subject: Re: OpenOffice Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > > Andreas Buening schrieb: > > Stefan.Neis at t-online.de wrote: > > > > -fno-implicit-templates or > > -fno-implicit-inline-templates > > will tell you. ;-) > > That's what I'm using for my own code, > but it requires adding code for explicit instantiation, so that's not > something > I'd like to add for a big application > that's heavily using STL. Isn't the idea of the STL that all code can be inlined? Bye, Andreas **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 19:35:11 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Re: Building EMACS v20.7 On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 09:58:17AM +1000, Arnstein Prytz wrote: > I can understand why NAME is needed for the build as well, I can understand why it would be needed too, but.... > because, in order > to compile the leim stuff, emacs.exe is called, which presumably needs NAME > irrespective of the input flags. I don't know why yours works. Have you > tried to compile by adding > > set NAME= > > to the start of the build script you posted? That would convince me that > somehow your system setup needs different variables set than Masaru's and > me. I doubt whether you will be convinced, but I did try it three times using this cmd file:- cd %tmp% tar zxf emacs-20.7.tar.gz tar zxf leim-20.7.tar.gz cd emacs-20.7 chmod +rw -R * gzip -dc ..\emacs-20.7-KIT1.9.tgz | tar xf - echo. echo Enter patch and if correctly identified confirm by pressing enter echo. call configure.cmd --with-bsd-socket --with-xf86sup-pty SET INCLUDE=%C_INCLUDE_PATH% SET NAME= env make It builds! Maybe it shouldn't, but it does. It does, however need %NAME% to be set or it to run. Don't ask for an explanation - I'm only the messenger ;-). > Regards, Arnstein > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Arnstein Prytz Arnstein.Prytz at jcu.edu.au > School of Maths and Physics ph: 61-7-47815183 > James Cook University fax: 61-7-47815880 > Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- John **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 08:57:58 +1000 (EST) From: "Alex Newman" Subject: OOO_1_1_1 and Innotek On Wed, 5 May 2004 18:57:51 +0100, John Poltorak wrote: > > If anyone is interested in trying to build Open Office can we agree an a > release version? I would be very surprised to find that Innotek haven't already tried running OO through their own OS/2 port of GCC/++ 3.?.?. It would be worth getting in touch with Sander or Achim to find out whether they did try to do this, and if they did, what might have gone wrong (e.g., project far too big..., os/2 version of c++ irremedially broken, broken/missing includes, libs, etc., etc.). Alex. **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 19:25:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Steve Wendt Subject: Re: OOO_1_1_1 and Innotek On Fri, 7 May 2004, Alex Newman wrote: > I would be very surprised to find that Innotek haven't already tried running OO through their own OS/2 port of > GCC/++ 3.?.?. > > It would be worth getting in touch with Sander or Achim to find out whether they did try to do this, and if they > did, what might have gone wrong (e.g., project far too big..., os/2 version of c++ irremedially broken, > broken/missing includes, libs, etc., etc.). Their message at WarpStock was that the porting effort was too much work, and they want to make use of Odin. **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 10:41:50 +0100 From: Stefan.Neis at t-online.de Subject: Re: distcc Hi, > > AFAIK, Innotek's changes have not been > > integrated > > into standard gcc distribution, or have they? > > I'm bot aware that distcc has any specific requirements in gcc? From had I read on this mailing list, I had the impression that recompiling gcc with specific extensions/settings is part of distcc compilation, but that probably was an error on my part, so ignore that question... Regards, Stefan