Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 00:04:05 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 340 ************************************************** Tuesday 06 April 2004 Number 340 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Autoconf v2.59 : Knut Stange Osmundsen 2 Re: Building Subversion : John Poltorak 3 config.h.in : John Poltorak 4 Libtool & DLLs : John Poltorak **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 21:11:41 +0200 From: Knut Stange Osmundsen Subject: Re: Autoconf v2.59 Andreas Buening wrote: > Knut St. Osmundsen wrote: > >> Andreas Buening wrote: [snip] >>> Btw, do you have the permission to submit patches to gnu.org? >> >> No. > > > Oh. Does this mean you haven't subscibed yet that paper for the FSF > or doesn't Innotek not allow you to do so? Haven't done so yet. (Never had any good enough stuff to submit yet.) Kind Regards, knut **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 09:35:58 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Building Subversion On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:37:59AM +0000, Johannes Fahrenkrug wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I was sick last week so I just had to go through a couple of hundred > emails this morning... > but sadly it seemed as if the discussion about building subversion... > umm... died. > Is anyone still working on it? Has any progress been made? > > I'm sure that it must be possible to at least build the client. We > have got to get that darn thing to work somehow :) I guess you need to provide some input to get this working... > -Johannes. -- John **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 09:47:41 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: config.h.in It has only just struck me that config.h.in is an automatically generated file created by autoheader, so presumably if it has been created by a version of autoheader which comes from a different version of autoconf than the one being used locally, then there is some possibility of a version conflict... I have no idea about the nature o any conflict, but if the possibility is there then does it make sense to automatically run autoheader as well as autoconf when building an app? -- John **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 12:38:44 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Libtool & DLLs I've just been looking at Libtool v1.4.3 which has been ported to OS/2 and trying out some of the demoes, but didn't see anything which created a DLL. Does anyone have a simple example of how to create one using libtool? -- John