From: UnixOS2 Archive To: "UnixOS2 Archive" Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:15:56 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 247 ************************************************** Thursday 20 November 2003 Number 247 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 RE: wxWindows OS/2 support : Dave Webster 2 db_version() : John Poltorak 3 Re: db_version() : Henry Sobotka 4 Re: db_version() : Henry Sobotka 5 RE: wxWindows OS/2 support : Dave Webster 6 RE: wxWindows OS/2 support : Dave Webster 7 Re: db_version() : T.Sikora" 8 Re: wxWindows OS/2 support : John Poltorak 9 Building PINE : John Poltorak 10 Re: db_version() : John Poltorak 11 Re: db_version() : John Poltorak 12 Re: db_version() : Lyn St George" 13 Re: db_version() : Lyn St George" 14 Re: wxWindows OS/2 support : John Poltorak 15 Re: db_version() : John Poltorak 16 RE: wxWindows OS/2 support : Stefan Neis 17 Re: db_version() : John Poltorak 18 RE: wxWindows OS/2 support : Adrian Gschwend" 19 Re: db_version() : Yuri Dario" 20 db.h & Posix/2 : John Poltorak 21 Posix/2 header problem? : John Poltorak 22 Re: db_version() : John Poltorak **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:26:09 -0600 From: Dave Webster Subject: RE: wxWindows OS/2 support Haven't gotten a hit off that list in almost a year. Try asking the main wx-dev group. -----Original Message----- From: John Poltorak [mailto:jp at warpix.org] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:47 AM To: os2-unix at mail.warpix.org Subject: Re: wxWindows OS/2 support On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 05:57:52PM +0100, Stefan Neis wrote: > Finally, there's > - wxwindows-os2pm at lists.sourceforge.net Is this list active? I tried subscribing yesterday but no request for confirmation yet... > Regards, > Stefan > -- > Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'. > -- John **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:29:46 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: db_version() Does the function db_version() exist within the EMX supplied db.lib? How do I tell what version is being used? -- John **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:43:59 -0500 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: db_version() John Poltorak wrote: > > Does the function db_version() exist within the EMX supplied db.lib? No. > How do I tell what version is being used? First sentence in emx/bsd/db/readme says it's 1.85. h~ **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:24:41 -0500 From: Henry Sobotka Subject: Re: db_version() John Poltorak wrote: > > Bogofilter fails to build because it can't find db_version(). > > Is there a more uptodate version around? Yes, from Sleepycat. h~ **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:23:38 -0600 From: Dave Webster Subject: RE: wxWindows OS/2 support I've been largely inactive for the past 8-9 months. I warned the boards I was pretty much off the wxOS2 project back then and would not be back for a year or more. We REALLY need MULTIPLE contributors to that whole effort. wxOS2 is mostly a hack. It needs serious reworking from the ground, up. An effort I will never be up to. I wrote most of the whole thing from scratch, attempting to simply copy wxMSW behavior. I never was much of a PM programmer, anyways. -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Gschwend [mailto:ktk at datacomm.ch] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:38 AM To: os2-unix at mail.warpix.org Subject: RE: wxWindows OS/2 support On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:26:09 -0600, Dave Webster wrote: >Haven't gotten a hit off that list in almost a year. Try asking the main >wx-dev group. oh that's why you are not responding! We had quite a lot of discussions on this page but I was always suprised that you do not respond at all. Could you please check your settings? there are postings on a regular base on this list cu Adrian -- Adrian Gschwend at netlabs.org ktk [a t] netlabs.org ------- Free Software for OS/2 and eCS http://www.netlabs.org **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:27:07 -0600 From: Dave Webster Subject: RE: wxWindows OS/2 support Must have been unsubscribed somewhere along the line. I sent a post to the wxOS2 list about five minutes ago and have yet to see it pop. -----Original Message----- From: John Poltorak [mailto:jp at warpix.org] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 11:38 AM To: os2-unix at mail.warpix.org Subject: Re: wxWindows OS/2 support On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:56:28PM +0100, Stefan Neis wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Dave Webster wrote: > > > Haven't gotten a hit off that list in almost a year. Try asking the main > > wx-dev group. > > Oops. Maybe you need to check your subscription status? I keep getting a > couple of mails per month... Can you post something to see if it gets to me? Who is the list owner? > Regards, > Stefan > -- > Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'. > -- John **= Email 7 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:10:05 -0500 From: "T.Sikora" Subject: Re: db_version() Yuri Dario wrote: > Hi John, > > >>Bogofilter fails to build because it can't find db_version(). >>Is there a more uptodate version around? > > > you need Berkeley DB 4.1 from Sleepycat to build bogofilter. > BerkeleyDB-4.1.25.zip was posted the other day. I have it in incoming at os2ports.com. -- T.Sikora tsikora at ntplx dot net **= Email 8 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:46:50 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: wxWindows OS/2 support On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 05:57:52PM +0100, Stefan Neis wrote: > Finally, there's > - wxwindows-os2pm at lists.sourceforge.net Is this list active? I tried subscribing yesterday but no request for confirmation yet... > Regards, > Stefan > -- > Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'. > -- John **= Email 9 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:49:07 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Building PINE Is it relatively easy to build PINE on OS/2? -- John **= Email 10 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:56:08 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: db_version() On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:43:59AM -0500, Henry Sobotka wrote: > John Poltorak wrote: > > > > Does the function db_version() exist within the EMX supplied db.lib? > > No. Bogofilter fails to build because it can't find db_version(). Is there a more uptodate version around? > h~ -- John **= Email 11 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:33:56 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: db_version() On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 11:24:41AM -0500, Henry Sobotka wrote: > John Poltorak wrote: > > > > Bogofilter fails to build because it can't find db_version(). > > > > Is there a more uptodate version around? > > Yes, from Sleepycat. I meant one that has been built and tested on OS/2 for a while... I built the latest version a few days ago, but there may be a couple of things which don't work correctly yet. I would prefer something a little more established. > h~ > -- John **= Email 12 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:38:23 +0000 From: "Lyn St George" Subject: Re: db_version() On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:56:08 +0000, John Poltorak wrote: >On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:43:59AM -0500, Henry Sobotka wrote: >> John Poltorak wrote: >> > >> > Does the function db_version() exist within the EMX supplied db.lib? >> >> No. > >Bogofilter fails to build because it can't find db_version(). > >Is there a more uptodate version around? If Bogofilter is looking in db.h then the 1.85 version contains no version info, whereas v 4x (and probably v 3.x) does. >> h~ > > >-- >John - Cheers Lyn St George +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + http://www.zolotek.net .. eCommerce hosting, consulting +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 13 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:20:28 +0000 From: "Lyn St George" Subject: Re: db_version() On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:33:56 +0000, John Poltorak wrote: >On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 11:24:41AM -0500, Henry Sobotka wrote: >> John Poltorak wrote: >> > >> > Bogofilter fails to build because it can't find db_version(). >> > >> > Is there a more uptodate version around? >> >> Yes, from Sleepycat. > >I meant one that has been built and tested on OS/2 for a while... > >I built the latest version a few days ago, but there may be a couple of >things which don't work correctly yet. I would prefer something a little >more established. You could try adding version info into the 1.85 db.h, along the same style as found in v4.x. Not tested ... > >> h~ >> > > >-- >John > > > - Cheers Lyn St George +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + http://www.zolotek.net .. eCommerce hosting, consulting +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 14 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:38:03 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: wxWindows OS/2 support On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:56:28PM +0100, Stefan Neis wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Dave Webster wrote: > > > Haven't gotten a hit off that list in almost a year. Try asking the main > > wx-dev group. > > Oops. Maybe you need to check your subscription status? I keep getting a > couple of mails per month... Can you post something to see if it gets to me? Who is the list owner? > Regards, > Stefan > -- > Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'. > -- John **= Email 15 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:39:13 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: db_version() On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 04:38:23PM +0000, Lyn St George wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:56:08 +0000, John Poltorak wrote: > > >On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:43:59AM -0500, Henry Sobotka wrote: > >> John Poltorak wrote: > >> > > >> > Does the function db_version() exist within the EMX supplied db.lib? > >> > >> No. > > > >Bogofilter fails to build because it can't find db_version(). > > > >Is there a more uptodate version around? > > If Bogofilter is looking in db.h then the 1.85 version contains no > version info, whereas v 4x (and probably v 3.x) does. Do you have libs available for either v3 or v4? > >> h~ > > > > > >-- > >John > > - > Cheers > Lyn St George > +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > + http://www.zolotek.net .. eCommerce hosting, consulting > +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- John **= Email 16 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:56:28 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan Neis Subject: RE: wxWindows OS/2 support On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Dave Webster wrote: > Haven't gotten a hit off that list in almost a year. Try asking the main > wx-dev group. Oops. Maybe you need to check your subscription status? I keep getting a couple of mails per month... Regards, Stefan -- Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'. **= Email 17 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 18:11:58 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: db_version() On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 06:39:12PM +0100, Yuri Dario wrote: > Hi John, > > >Bogofilter fails to build because it can't find db_version(). > >Is there a more uptodate version around? > > you need Berkeley DB 4.1 from Sleepycat to build bogofilter. Yuri, Do you have a copy I can use? I tried building it myself the other day, but am not sure about its build quality :-)... > Bye, > > Yuri Dario > > /* > * member of TeamOS/2 - Italy > * http://www.os2power.com/yuri > * http://www.teamos2.it > */ -- John **= Email 18 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 18:38:15 +0100 (CET) From: "Adrian Gschwend" Subject: RE: wxWindows OS/2 support On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:26:09 -0600, Dave Webster wrote: >Haven't gotten a hit off that list in almost a year. Try asking the main >wx-dev group. oh that's why you are not responding! We had quite a lot of discussions on this page but I was always suprised that you do not respond at all. Could you please check your settings? there are postings on a regular base on this list cu Adrian -- Adrian Gschwend at netlabs.org ktk [a t] netlabs.org ------- Free Software for OS/2 and eCS http://www.netlabs.org **= Email 19 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 18:39:12 +0100 (CET) From: "Yuri Dario" Subject: Re: db_version() Hi John, >Bogofilter fails to build because it can't find db_version(). >Is there a more uptodate version around? you need Berkeley DB 4.1 from Sleepycat to build bogofilter. Bye, Yuri Dario /* * member of TeamOS/2 - Italy * http://www.os2power.com/yuri * http://www.teamos2.it */ **= Email 20 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:21:56 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: db.h & Posix/2 Berkeley DB contains db.h as does Posix/2 although a much older version. In fact is very similar to the one which comes with EMX, although slightly different, so now I have three different db.h files. What is the best way of handling this? Can Posix/2 be updated to use the latest db.h from Sleepycat? -- John **= Email 21 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:36:32 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Posix/2 header problem? Having just tried the Berkeley DB lib from OS2PORTS, it resolves previous errors but finishes with what looks like an error in a Posix/2 header:- Making install in src make[1]: Entering directory `U:/unixos2/workdir/bogofilter-0.15.8/src' Making install in . make[2]: Entering directory `U:/unixos2/workdir/bogofilter-0.15.8/src' source='globals.c' object='globals.o' libtool=no \ depfile='.deps/globals.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/globals.TPo' \ depmode=gcc u:/bin/sh ../depcomp \ gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../trio -I.. -DBOGOFILTER -Wall -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -ggdb -fno-common -Wchar-subscripts -Wcomment -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wpointer-arith -c `test -f 'globals.c' || echo './'`globals.c In file included from u:\posix2\include\sys/syslog.h:36, from u:\posix2\include\syslog.h:6, from common.h:24, from globals.h:10, from globals.c:14: paths.h:37: parse error before `which' paths.h:37: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype make[2]: *** [globals.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `U:/unixos2/workdir/bogofilter-0.15.8/src' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `U:/unixos2/workdir/bogofilter-0.15.8/src' make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 Anyone see what's wrong here? -- John **= Email 22 ==========================** Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:39:54 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: db_version() On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 01:10:05PM -0500, T.Sikora wrote: > Yuri Dario wrote: > > Hi John, > > > > > >>Bogofilter fails to build because it can't find db_version(). > >>Is there a more uptodate version around? > > > > > > you need Berkeley DB 4.1 from Sleepycat to build bogofilter. > > > > BerkeleyDB-4.1.25.zip was posted the other day. I have it in incoming at > os2ports.com. Thanks. Just what I needed. A little different from mine. Any idea where it came from? > -- > T.Sikora > tsikora at ntplx dot net > > -- John