From: UnixOS2 Archive To: "UnixOS2 Archive" Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 14:15:15 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 229 ************************************************** Saturday 01 November 2003 Number 229 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Syslog : Dave and Natalie" 2 Re: Building Python : Stefan Neis 3 Syslog : John Poltorak **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 17:20:27 -0800 From: "Dave and Natalie" Subject: Re: Syslog On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 19:52:04 +0000, John Poltorak wrote: > > >Can anyone provide me with a URL for downloading the most current source >for BSD Syslog? > Does BSD still use Syslog? Anyways poking around I found this http://www.balabit.com/products/syslog_ng/ which is the next generation syslog. Also there was a new syslog posted to Hobbes the other day. http://hobbes.nmsu.edu/pub/os2/util/system/syslog3a.zip **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 18:22:39 +0100 (CET) From: Stefan Neis Subject: Re: Building Python On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Dave and Natalie wrote: > Is it possible to change from export by ordinal to export by name without breaking > older stuff? Well, older stuff importing things by ordinal would have to be "re-linked". If you are careful to get ordinals right you can have an intermediate step where the library is already doing export/import by name but the DLL is still suitable for old applications relying on the ordinals, but that of course implies that you still have to take care to get the ordinals right, i.e. you still need to manually reorder things as needed. Regards, Stefan -- Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'. **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 19:52:04 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Syslog Can anyone provide me with a URL for downloading the most current source for BSD Syslog? -- John