From: UnixOS2 Archive To: "UnixOS2 Archive" Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 14:15:14 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 228 ************************************************** Friday 31 October 2003 Number 228 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Posix/2 : John Poltorak **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 11:15:49 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Posix/2 On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 05:47:09PM +0100, Stefan Neis wrote: > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, John Poltorak wrote: > > > What is the current status of Posix/2 > > Nobody is currently working on it, AFAIK Have there been any updates since you last put a snapshot on OS2PORTS? > (my spare time available for > programming being entirely consumed by wxWindows, currently; situation > seems similar for others). Also, it "works for me". Can wxWindows be built with UX2BS? In fact, can I download a wxWindows app from anywhere to see what it provides? > > and does the development of libc by > > Innotek have any bearing on its future? > > Personally, I think Posix/2 would be a nice addition on top of Innotek's > libc, or could even be incorporated into it over time I'm currently including Posix/2 in UX2BS, so adding Innotek's libc might provide what you suggest. Is there likely to be any conflicts? BTW did you ever manage to build Perl with Posix/2? > Regards, > Stefan > -- > Micro$oft is not an answer. It is a question. The answer is 'no'. > -- John