From: UnixOS2 Archive To: "UnixOS2 Archive" Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:14:00 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 220 ************************************************** Tuesday 21 October 2003 Number 220 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Recent ImageMagick binary? : Lewis G Rosenthal 2 Kismet : Lewis G Rosenthal 3 sslwrap : Lewis G Rosenthal 4 Re: sslwrap : John Poltorak 5 Re: Kismet : Adrian Gschwend" 6 Re: mailman-src-build : John Poltorak 7 Re: sslwrap : Lewis G Rosenthal 8 Re: Teapop : Lewis G Rosenthal 9 Teapop : John Poltorak 10 Re: sslwrap : John Poltorak 11 Re: Python : John Poltorak 12 zlib : John Poltorak 13 Posix/2 : John Poltorak **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:53:41 -0700 From: Lewis G Rosenthal Subject: Re: Recent ImageMagick binary? Thanks, and sorry for the late reply (Warpstock 2003). Unfortunately, the latest build on os2ports is 4.2.2, which is the one I already have. Oh, well... Another project to add to the ever-increasing pile (Kismet, sslwrap, ImageMagick...) T.Sikora wrote: > Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > >> Anyone have a recent ImageMagick binary package floating around? I'm >> working with some PHP stuff which wants to do some graphic >> manipulations, and ImageMagick is the "preferred" backend for it. The >> most recent build I could find was off of NetLabs' page, dated back >> to 1999. As I'm looking at having to completely revamp my build >> environment, I was hoping to try to sidestep the issue for now by >> just trying someone else's port... >> >> TIA >> > A few different versions here. > > http://os2ports.com/downloads/index_html?dir=pub/os2/unix/xfree86/ports/graphics/ > > -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------ Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA Rosenthal & Rosenthal Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com Team OS/2 / NetWare Users International www.novell.com ------------------------------------------------------------ This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 03:53 hours and 32 seconds **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:58:39 -0700 From: Lewis G Rosenthal Subject: Kismet Has anyone attempted to build Kismet (http://www.kismetwireless.net/) under GCC 3.2.2 as yet (it requires stdint.h and inttype.h, which appear to finally be included in the latest beta)? -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------ Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA Rosenthal & Rosenthal Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com Team OS/2 / NetWare Users International www.novell.com ------------------------------------------------------------ This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 03:57 hours and 43 seconds **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 01:00:53 -0700 From: Lewis G Rosenthal Subject: sslwrap Sorry for the barrage tonight, everyone. I've been at ISPCON 2003, and in between sessions, I've been playing... Has anyone tried building sslwrap (http://www.quiltaholic.com/rickk/sslwrap/) as yet? It's a generic SSL wrapper for HTTP, SMTP, POP3, etc. TIA -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------ Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA Rosenthal & Rosenthal Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com Team OS/2 / NetWare Users International www.novell.com ------------------------------------------------------------ This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 04:00 hours and 28 seconds **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:06:09 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: sslwrap On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:00:53AM -0700, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > Sorry for the barrage tonight, everyone. I've been at ISPCON 2003, and > in between sessions, I've been playing... > > Has anyone tried building sslwrap > (http://www.quiltaholic.com/rickk/sslwrap/) as yet? It's a generic SSL > wrapper for HTTP, SMTP, POP3, etc. Is it the usual configure & Make deal? Have you followed the instructions for building it? Sometimes you can get pretty close to compiling some of these apps without changing much. > TIA > > -- > Lewis > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA > Rosenthal & Rosenthal > Accountants / Network Consultants > New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com > Team OS/2 / NetWare Users International www.novell.com > ------------------------------------------------------------ > This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 04:00 hours and 28 seconds > > -- John **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:06:30 +0200 (CEST) From: "Adrian Gschwend" Subject: Re: Kismet On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:58:39 -0700, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: >Has anyone attempted to build Kismet (http://www.kismetwireless.net/) >under GCC 3.2.2 as yet (it requires stdint.h and inttype.h, which appear >to finally be included in the latest beta)? haven't tried but looks very interesting. Would be a cute port cu Adrian -- Adrian Gschwend at netlabs.org ktk [a t] netlabs.org ------- Free Software for OS/2 and eCS http://www.netlabs.org **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:18:09 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: mailman-src-build On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 02:22:50PM -0400, T.Sikora wrote: > I have a mailman-src-build package at: > > ftp://os2ports.com/pub/os2/unix/internet/mail/lists/mailman/mailman-src-build.zip > > ftp://os2ports.com/pub/os2/unix/internet/mail/lists/mailman/mailman-os2-build.faq > > It's looking more and more like it has to be built on the server it runs on. It must be possible to create the environment which the program expects. My suspicion is that there is an implicit assumption made by the program which may not necessarily apply on a different system. > -- > T.Sikora > tsikora at ntplx dot net -- John **= Email 7 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:25:26 -0700 From: Lewis G Rosenthal Subject: Re: sslwrap Actually, John, I haven't had a chance to even get close to looking at the source. I may get an opportunity this weekend, though after taking last Friday through today (Wednesday) off and away from the family, I may be headed for some "domestic disturbances" is I spend too much time in front of the screen this weekend! :-) What would be an appropriate venue for this sort of porting project? os2ports.com? netlabs? sourceforge? I'm thinking of taking proposals from capable people to port some of this useful ethernet and server stuff over, but I want to put it where it will get the most exposure. John Poltorak wrote: >On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 01:00:53AM -0700, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > > >>Sorry for the barrage tonight, everyone. I've been at ISPCON 2003, and >>in between sessions, I've been playing... >> >>Has anyone tried building sslwrap >>(http://www.quiltaholic.com/rickk/sslwrap/) as yet? It's a generic SSL >>wrapper for HTTP, SMTP, POP3, etc. >> >> > > >Is it the usual configure & Make deal? > >Have you followed the instructions for building it? Sometimes you can get >pretty close to compiling some of these apps without changing much. > > > > >>TIA >> >>-- >>Lewis >>------------------------------------------------------------ >>Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA >> Rosenthal & Rosenthal >>Accountants / Network Consultants >> New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com >>Team OS/2 / NetWare Users International www.novell.com >>------------------------------------------------------------ >>This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 04:00 hours and 28 seconds >> >> >> >> > > > > -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------ Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA Rosenthal & Rosenthal Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com Team OS/2 / NetWare Users International www.novell.com ------------------------------------------------------------ This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 01:42 hours and 21 seconds **= Email 8 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 11:31:43 -0700 From: Lewis G Rosenthal Subject: Re: Teapop I'm going to have a good lcose look at this, John. It seems to support a wide array of important features which otherwise would cost a substantial amount of money in a commercial product. John Poltorak wrote: >Does anyone have any experience the Teapop pop server? > >See:- > >http://www.toontown.org/teapop/ > >Will it build on OS/2? > > > > -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------ Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA Rosenthal & Rosenthal Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com Team OS/2 / NetWare Users International www.novell.com ------------------------------------------------------------ This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 01:50 hours and 38 seconds **= Email 9 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 14:36:08 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Teapop Does anyone have any experience the Teapop pop server? See:- http://www.toontown.org/teapop/ Will it build on OS/2? -- John **= Email 10 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:59:04 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: sslwrap On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 11:25:26AM -0700, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > Actually, John, I haven't had a chance to even get close to looking at > the source. I wouldn't bother checking the source. Just try building it and see what problems arise. > I may get an opportunity this weekend, though after taking > last Friday through today (Wednesday) off and away from the family, I > may be headed for some "domestic disturbances" is I spend too much time > in front of the screen this weekend! :-) > > What would be an appropriate venue for this sort of porting project? > os2ports.com? netlabs? sourceforge? I'm thinking of taking proposals > from capable people to port some of this useful ethernet and server > stuff over, but I want to put it where it will get the most exposure. Well there is always UX2BS. It has been a little quiet recently, but I think quite a few programs have managed to get built at one time or another once a standard build environment was established. It was good to be able to get Perl built without any hassle at all. > -- > Lewis > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA > Rosenthal & Rosenthal > Accountants / Network Consultants > New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com > Team OS/2 / NetWare Users International www.novell.com > ------------------------------------------------------------ > This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 01:42 hours and 21 seconds > -- John **= Email 11 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:14:53 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Python On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 12:44:15PM -0400, T.Sikora wrote: > John Poltorak wrote: > > I'm trying to rationalise my system for using Python and Python apps. > > There's currently three versions of Python to choose from, 2.2.2, 2.2.3 > > and 2.3. Naturally, I would like to use the most recently available one, > > which thanks to the great efforts of Andrew MacIntyre keeps us pretty well > > up to date. In fact so far up to date, that the two main Python apps > > available, Mailman and Zope cannot use this version, which means sticking > > with 2.2.3 for the time being. > > > > Does anyone know any other Python apps available on OS/2? > > > > > Thats it except older ones. Andrews port is the gold standard in OS/2. > 2.2.3 works with pretty much all current apps. 2.3 is new and untested > field wise. Zope is broken with it in any version. I'm sure others are > too. Linux too. Just noticed the Andrew has brought us completely uptodate today with his release of 2.3.2! Great work, Andrew. > -- > T.Sikora > tsikora at ntplx dot net -- John **= Email 12 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:32:08 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: zlib Is anyone the acknowledged OS/2 maintainer of ZLIB? -- John **= Email 13 ==========================** Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:39:30 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Posix/2 What is the current status of Posix/2 and does the development of libc by Innotek have any bearing on its future? -- John