From: UnixOS2 Archive To: "UnixOS2 Archive" Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:13:54 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 216 ************************************************** Thursday 16 October 2003 Number 216 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: gcc 3.2.2b3 distrib question for Knut : knut st. osmundsen" 2 Re: : knut st. osmundsen" 3 Re: gcc 3.2.2b3 distrib question for Knut : John Poltorak 4 Re: BIND : John Poltorak **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 06:23:28 +0200 (CEST) From: "knut st. osmundsen" Subject: Re: gcc 3.2.2b3 distrib question for Knut > Hi Knut, > > For a complete distribution, do I download everything in the subdirectory, > or just the *-beta3.zip and *-beta3-src-*.zips? With or without libc.zip? And > is the gccenv.cmd somewhere in there or is the one from b2 ok? I'll add a readme/index for the distribution files some time, but for the present: -The gcc-3.2.2-beta3.zip contains everything. -The gcc-3.2.2-beta3-docs.zip contains release docs so you can see what's changed before downloading it. (You will find a description of the distro files in there too if you look carefully.) -The gcc-3.2.2-beta3-core.zip is everything you need usually (it include the docs.zip stuff). -The other non src zips are extra stuff, like map files, binaries and libs with debug info and other more or less useful stuff. -The src zips should be selfexplaining when I've mentioned that the emx one includes the LIBC sources. Kind Regards, knut **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 06:25:58 +0200 (CEST) From: "knut st. osmundsen" Subject: Re: > OK, I seem to have it sorted: found the pages on the Google cache. > > > Alexander Newman wrote: > > I'm getting repeated > "record too long" errors from emxomfar aus gcc-3.2.2b2 and b3 > > The correct answer was, of course, add -Zomf to [C/LD]FLAGS. If I remember it I'll add a check for AR archives in emxomfar and give you a better message. Kind Regards, knut **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:39:41 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: gcc 3.2.2b3 distrib question for Knut On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:23:28AM +0200, knut st. osmundsen wrote: > -The src zips should be selfexplaining when I've mentioned that the emx > one includes the LIBC sources. Is it possible to build this version from source using gcc v2.8.1? > Kind Regards, > knut -- John **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:38:16 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: BIND On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 02:29:35AM +1000, IanM wrote: > Hey Ted, anyone > > Feelin bored ? > At a loose end ? > Need a real challenge ;-) > > ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind/src/8.4.1 What happens when you run the usual configure & make routine? > > Cheers > IanM > http://www.os2site.com/ > > "Operating Systems manufactured by Microsoft are by far the most popular, with millions of copies in use worldwide. OS/2 fans, on the other hand, may note that cockroaches are far more numerous than humans, and that numbers alone do not denote a higher life form." -- John