From: UnixOS2 Archive To: "UnixOS2 Archive" Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 14:13:49 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 212 ************************************************** Saturday 11 October 2003 Number 212 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Innotek LIBC and glinks : Alex Newman" 2 Recent ImageMagick binary? : Lewis G Rosenthal 3 Re: Recent ImageMagick binary? : T.Sikora" **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 08:58:34 +1000 (EST) From: "Alex Newman" Subject: Re: Innotek LIBC and glinks On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 20:24:22 +0200, Knut St. Osmundsen wrote: > > This happened when configure was testing for things that aren't here > > so yes unresolved symbols. > The crash is fixed in the Beta 3 I quitely put out earlier this week. > (ftp://ftp.innotek.de/pub/gccos2/3.2.2-beta3/) Updates to the docs are very useful: many thanks! Cheers, Alex. **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 11:22:03 -0400 From: Lewis G Rosenthal Subject: Recent ImageMagick binary? Anyone have a recent ImageMagick binary package floating around? I'm working with some PHP stuff which wants to do some graphic manipulations, and ImageMagick is the "preferred" backend for it. The most recent build I could find was off of NetLabs' page, dated back to 1999. As I'm looking at having to completely revamp my build environment, I was hoping to try to sidestep the issue for now by just trying someone else's port... TIA -- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------ Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA Rosenthal & Rosenthal Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com Team OS/2 / NetWare Users International www.novell.com ------------------------------------------------------------ This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 20:46 hours and 22 seconds **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 12:41:51 -0400 From: "T.Sikora" Subject: Re: Recent ImageMagick binary? Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > Anyone have a recent ImageMagick binary package floating around? I'm > working with some PHP stuff which wants to do some graphic > manipulations, and ImageMagick is the "preferred" backend for it. The > most recent build I could find was off of NetLabs' page, dated back to > 1999. As I'm looking at having to completely revamp my build > environment, I was hoping to try to sidestep the issue for now by just > trying someone else's port... > > TIA > A few different versions here. http://os2ports.com/downloads/index_html?dir=pub/os2/unix/xfree86/ports/graphics/ -- T.Sikora tsikora at ntplx dot net