From: UnixOS2 Archive To: "UnixOS2 Archive" Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:13:47 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 210 ************************************************** Wednesday 08 October 2003 Number 210 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Innotek LIBC and glinks : Alex Newman" 2 Re: Re: Innotek LIBC and glinks : Alexander Newman **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 07:42:31 +1000 (EST) From: "Alex Newman" Subject: Re: Innotek LIBC and glinks On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 19:24:25 -0800, Dave and Natalie wrote: > > Links-2.1pre11 with the included configure using this command > F:\usr\src\links-2.1pre11 > sh configure --prefix=/usr > --enable-javascript --enable-graphics --with-x --with-pmshell > XFree86 also wasn't detected but I think that maybe a configuration > problem here. Did you add --x-includes=/XFree86/include --x-libraries=/Xfree86/lib near --with-x on the configure c/l? This overcomes that problem for me. I am still having a bad time with _sigsetjmp and _siglongjmp (undef-ed symbols) using 322b2 attempting to build gdk-pixbuf 0.22.0. Anyone else having this problem? Alex. **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 11:48:37 +1000 From: Alexander Newman Subject: Re: Re: Innotek LIBC and glinks > Dave and Natalie wrote: > > On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 07:42:31 +1000 (EST), Alex Newman wrote: > > > > >I am still having a bad time with _sigsetjmp and _siglongjmp > (undef-ed > >symbols) using 322b2 attempting to build gdk-pixbuf 0.22.0. Anyone > else > >having this problem? > > The problem is that 322b2 libc has __sigsetjmp and __siglongjmp. All > I can think of offhand is redefining sigsetjmp as _sigsetjmp etc. Not > sure if will work. No, unfortunately. I even tried hacking about with but to no avail. So it looks as though they're missing from a .lib (or .a) file. If it's not in a library, I guess there's no point in badgering Innotek about it? Wait for b3, I guess... Alex.