From: UnixOS2 Archive To: "UnixOS2 Archive" Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:13:46 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 209 ************************************************** Tuesday 07 October 2003 Number 209 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Checking for word in a string : Pete Milne 2 Re: Checking for word in a string : John Poltorak 3 Re: Innotek LIBC and glinks : Dave and Natalie" 4 Re: Innotek LIBC and glinks : Dave and Natalie" **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:56:16 +0100 From: Pete Milne Subject: Re: Checking for word in a string John Poltorak wrote: > >I've tried looking at bogofilter but my eyes quickly glaze over after a >few pages of the docs. It doesn't look very easy to set up at all. > >Is there any 'quick start' option for simply dealing with something like >Swen so that I can at least get something working and progress from there? > > > There's a new program available on LEO that can test mail for spam-ness on your ISP's server and delete it there. It's in the Win32 section at LEO, but it is an OS/2 program all the same. At the moment it's only available in German, but other nlv's are promised. I've only run it twice so far but it seems to work ok. ftp://ftp.leo.org/pub/comp/os/windows/win32/utils/antispam/deleatur/deleatur210o.zip Pete **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 14:04:45 +0100 From: John Poltorak Subject: Re: Checking for word in a string On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:56:16AM +0100, Pete Milne wrote: > John Poltorak wrote: > > > > >I've tried looking at bogofilter but my eyes quickly glaze over after a > >few pages of the docs. It doesn't look very easy to set up at all. > > > >Is there any 'quick start' option for simply dealing with something like > >Swen so that I can at least get something working and progress from there? > > > > > > > There's a new program available on LEO that can test mail for spam-ness > on your ISP's server and delete it there. I run my own mail server, and am just starting to get the hang of bogofilter so, before long, I should be able to delete any spamming arriving, although the ideal solution would be to block it and stop it arriving in the first place. I was wondering if there are any regulatory authorities you can complain to when receiving spam. I notice that quite a lot of them are from BTINTERNET addresses, so I should be able to complain to someone in the UK about them. > Pete -- John **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 17:31:39 -0800 From: "Dave and Natalie" Subject: Re: Innotek LIBC and glinks On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 07:42:31 +1000 (EST), Alex Newman wrote: >On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 19:24:25 -0800, Dave and Natalie wrote: > >> >> Links-2.1pre11 with the included configure using this command >> F:\usr\src\links-2.1pre11 > sh configure --prefix=/usr >> --enable-javascript --enable-graphics --with-x --with-pmshell >> XFree86 also wasn't detected but I think that maybe a configuration >> problem here. > >Did you add --x-includes=/XFree86/include >--x-libraries=/Xfree86/lib near --with-x on the configure c/l? This >overcomes that problem for me. Actually rebuilding configure with autoconf 2.13 allowed configure to find X. Haven't had any time lately so haven't done much. Dave **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 18:04:34 -0800 From: "Dave and Natalie" Subject: Re: Innotek LIBC and glinks On Thu, 09 Oct 2003 07:42:31 +1000 (EST), Alex Newman wrote: > >I am still having a bad time with _sigsetjmp and _siglongjmp (undef-ed >symbols) using 322b2 attempting to build gdk-pixbuf 0.22.0. Anyone else >having this problem? The problem is that 322b2 libc has __sigsetjmp and __siglongjmp. All I can think of offhand is redefining sigsetjmp as _sigsetjmp etc. Not sure if will work. Dave