From: UnixOS2 Archive To: "UnixOS2 Archive" Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 14:11:38 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 195 ************************************************** Monday 15 September 2003 Number 195 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: gdk-pixbuf (was Re: Mailman tweaking) : Dave and Natalie" 2 Re: Mozilla_build script : Adrian Gschwend" **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 07:18:47 -0800 From: "Dave and Natalie" Subject: Re: gdk-pixbuf (was Re: Mailman tweaking) On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 23:48:30 -0800, Dave and Natalie wrote: > >Well I built v 0.22.0 by running sh configure --prefix=/XFree86, make >Only problem was in building pixbuf-demo.exe. For some reason make >wasn't linking in the graphic libs so I just hacked the makefile. (had >the same problem with 0.11.0). pixbuf-demo runs fine so it seems to >work. Nice demo. My mistake. It was pixbuf.a that wasn't getting the graphic libs linked in. Dave **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 18:45:06 +0200 (CDT) From: "Adrian Gschwend" Subject: Re: Mozilla_build script On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 14:42:01 +0200, Andreas Buening wrote: >That's exactly the same kind of useless rumours I've heard myself. :-( >We need a real answer and we need the real source. And we need it >now (or within the next month or so). Otherwise nothing will be >decided, nothing will happen, everybody will still wait for >libemu/Innotek/christmas/insert_your_favorite_here. If Innotek >doesn't do anything we'll have to try to start to revive emx again. >We've really been stuck long enough. for those who didn't notice yet, it is officialy out now, including source cu Adrian -- Adrian Gschwend at netlabs.org ktk [a t] netlabs.org ------- Free Software for OS/2 and eCS http://www.netlabs.org