From: UnixOS2 Archive To: "UnixOS2 Archive" Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:09:59 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 165 ************************************************** Sunday 10 August 2003 Number 165 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: Innotek libc license & release issues (was Re: [EMX] Re: libc) : Jeff Robinson 2 Innotek libc license & release issues (was Re: [EMX] Re: libc) : Adrian Gschwend" **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:14:22 -0500 From: Jeff Robinson Subject: Re: Innotek libc license & release issues (was Re: [EMX] Re: libc) Adrian Gschwend wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:39:02 +0200 (CDT), Adrian Gschwend wrote: > > >>>I also have vague memories of "no Unix support" so I'm sceptical. >>>What's their license model? If they don't use BSD or GPL license >>>this won't be of much help for us. >> >>It most definitely won't be GPL because IBM itself does not like GPL >>(at least not for stuff on OS/2...). I think we can expect it with a >>BSD-license model. For sure the final word is up to Achim. He should be >>back this week, so expect comments later this week. > > > Talked to Achim on #netlabs today, the code will be released under > LGPL. The development will be coordinated by Innotek at first. Patches > and enhancements to the code are welcome but Innotek will keep the lead > at first at least because they have a deal with IBM about it. So it's > up to them to accept or refuse code. But in a long term (which means > when the IBM deal is fulfilled) they will be "open for everything" > (quoting Achim here). > > We can expect code in about 1 - 2 weeks according to Achim. > Sounds like pretty good news to me; thanks for the scoop Adrian! Jeff -- ---------------- Whatza JamochaMUD? http://jamochamud.anecho.mb.ca Or other stuff: http://www.anecho.mb.ca/~jeffnik ----------------------------------------------------------- **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:23:07 +0200 (CDT) From: "Adrian Gschwend" Subject: Innotek libc license & release issues (was Re: [EMX] Re: libc) On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:39:02 +0200 (CDT), Adrian Gschwend wrote: >>I also have vague memories of "no Unix support" so I'm sceptical. >>What's their license model? If they don't use BSD or GPL license >>this won't be of much help for us. > >It most definitely won't be GPL because IBM itself does not like GPL >(at least not for stuff on OS/2...). I think we can expect it with a >BSD-license model. For sure the final word is up to Achim. He should be >back this week, so expect comments later this week. Talked to Achim on #netlabs today, the code will be released under LGPL. The development will be coordinated by Innotek at first. Patches and enhancements to the code are welcome but Innotek will keep the lead at first at least because they have a deal with IBM about it. So it's up to them to accept or refuse code. But in a long term (which means when the IBM deal is fulfilled) they will be "open for everything" (quoting Achim here). We can expect code in about 1 - 2 weeks according to Achim. I think this is great news for us and I am looking forward to the first release. If you have any more questions I might ask Achim again but please post to the UnixOS2 list, I'm not on EMX. >Just as reminder, I'm off for the next 2.5 weeks so no more news from >my side till then. I'm back btw :) cu Adrian -- Adrian Gschwend at netlabs.org ktk [a t] netlabs.org ------- Free Software for OS/2 and eCS http://www.netlabs.org