From: UnixOS2 Archive To: "UnixOS2 Archive" Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 04:49:19 EST-10EDT,10,-1,0,7200,3,-1,0,7200,3600 Subject: [UnixOS2_Archive] No. 28 ************************************************** Tuesday 28 January 2003 Number 28 ************************************************** Subjects for today 1 Re: OpenLDAP : Sergey Yevtushenko 2 Re: UnixOS/2 docs : Andreas Buening 3 Re: New RSYNC : Ted Sikora 4 Re: OpenLDAP : Hannes Hromadka 5 Berkeley Mail : John Poltorak 6 Re: gcc -l : Ken Ames 7 Sent this to the wrong address yesterday...but trolling for help. : Dave Webster 8 New RSYNC : John Poltorak 9 Re: Sent this to the wrong address yesterday...but trol ling for help. .. : Ken Ames 10 gcc -l : John Poltorak 11 RE: Sent this to the wrong address yesterday...but trol : Dave Webster 12 Re: Sent this to the wrong address yesterday...but trolling for help. .. : Yuri Dario" 13 LyX 1.2.3 : Christian Hennecke" 14 Re: gcc -l : Thomas Hoffmann **= Email 1 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:44:29 +0200 From: Sergey Yevtushenko Subject: Re: OpenLDAP Adrian Gschwend wrote: >>Unfortunately my time schedule is extremely tight these days >>and I can't port OpenLDAP.. > > > I remember a japanese port, probably this is the one John found. Is > this really just a client? If you mean http://www.jjcc.com/products/ldapsdk/ then this is just SDK, even not client, although client part should not be hard to port using this SDK. -- *--------------------------------------------- ES at Home http://es.os2.ru/ **= Email 2 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 01:19:04 +0100 From: Andreas Buening Subject: Re: UnixOS/2 docs Jeff Robinson wrote: [snip] > Indeed, I'd very much appreciate help! I'd like input from folks > that're working on different ports as I generally can't remember what is > going on half the time between this list and dabbling with my own projects. [snip] > If anyone is working on projects they want listed, please drop me a line > and I'll try to include the info. What do you want to put into that single line? And how much fits into one line? What about the following format? For the core subset: package latest stable NLS status latest beta status Unix version sed 4.0.5 yes works - - 4.0.5 grep 2.4.2 yes works(*) - - 2.5 (broken) (*) Some internal tests don't work. For the developer subset: package latest stable NLS status latest beta status Unix version autoconf 2.57 - works(**,1) - - 2.57 automake 1.7.2 - works(**,2) - - 1.7.2 (**) The internal testsuite doesn't work. (1) see autoconf description (2) minor patch to be applied Bye, Andreas -- One OS to rule them all, One OS to find them, One OS to bring them all and in the darkness bind them In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. **= Email 3 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 08:46:11 -0500 From: Ted Sikora Subject: Re: New RSYNC OK John Poltorak wrote: > > There has been a new release of RSYNC which is available from:- > > ftp://rsync.samba.org/pub/rsync/rsync-2.5.6.tar.gz > > Can anyone try and get this built on OS/2? > > We have v2.5.5 which is really good to have around, but it would be even > better to get the OS/2 patches rolled into the mainstream version so we > could hope to be uptodate as soon as a new release is made. > > You can see what's new in the latest release here:- > > ftp://rsync.samba.org/pub/rsync/rsync-2.5.6-NEWS > -- -- Ted Sikora tsikora at ntplx.net **= Email 4 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:01:54 +0100 From: Hannes Hromadka Subject: Re: OpenLDAP On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:44:29AM +0200, Sergey Yevtushenko wrote: > Adrian Gschwend wrote: > > >>Unfortunately my time schedule is extremely tight these days > >>and I can't port OpenLDAP.. > > > > > >I remember a japanese port, probably this is the one John found. Is > >this really just a client? > > If you mean http://www.jjcc.com/products/ldapsdk/ then this is just SDK, > even not client, although client part should not be hard to port using > this SDK. There is also a Rexx Api from the same author. name: RXLDAP version: 0.21 2001-11-26 creator: YANO Takashi (IBM: tyano at yamato.ibm.com, Internet: tyano at tk.airnet.ne.jp) function: LDAP API for OS/2 REXX requirement: OS/2 Warp4 or later with TCP/IP functions I used this a while ago to access our ldap based phone on OS/2 Ciao, Hannes -- Johannes Hromadka | Email Office: HromadkaJ at gmx.at | Home : Johannes.Hromadka at gmx.net Vienna/Austria/Europe | OECC: http://www.oecc.org/ >>> Rust never sleeps (borrowed from Neil YOUNG) <<< **= Email 5 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:15:15 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: Berkeley Mail Has anyone ever come across an OS/2 port of Berkeley Mail ? Where would I find the source if I wanted to build it myself? -- John **= Email 6 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:20:54 -0800 From: Ken Ames Subject: Re: gcc -l ummm, set LIBRARY_PATH= Ken John Poltorak wrote: >Is there an environment variable that can be used with gcc instead of >using -lLIB on the gcc command line ? > > > > **= Email 7 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:25:43 -0600 From: Dave Webster Subject: Sent this to the wrong address yesterday...but trolling for help. Trolling for assistance. Over the past week or so I have coded up the last two remaining controls for the OS/2 port of wxWindows, the listctrl and treectrl. I am in the process of trying to get the listctrl to work by using the listctrl sample. Both controls are WC_CONTAINERs. The listctrl is a container in either ICON, NAME, TEXT or DETAILS view. The treectrl is a container in TREE view mode. Right now I'm working solely on the listctrl. The sample test applet loads 30 records with a default being the wxLC_REPORT( OS/2's CV_DETAIL) view with three columns. It just flat out doesn't work even though I have followed the PM programmer's guide and the OS2TK45 sample with a container, in detail. All it does is display a grey box in the upper left corner of the control. Unfortunately, the code is only in wx25 which is available only via CVS from wxWindows.org. So if any of you experienced PM WC_CONTAINER programmers have connected up with wxWindows' CVS tree, update your sources to get my latest effort and tell me what I'm doing wrong??? Keep in mind, the wxWindows class interface structure precludes doing a lot of things the way a normal PM programmer would do them writing a 'C' based app. But I feel I'm missing something fundamental. So if there are any good PM programmers out there, I could use some assistance in getting over this last major hurdle. **= Email 8 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:07:53 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: New RSYNC There has been a new release of RSYNC which is available from:- ftp://rsync.samba.org/pub/rsync/rsync-2.5.6.tar.gz Can anyone try and get this built on OS/2? We have v2.5.5 which is really good to have around, but it would be even better to get the OS/2 patches rolled into the mainstream version so we could hope to be uptodate as soon as a new release is made. You can see what's new in the latest release here:- ftp://rsync.samba.org/pub/rsync/rsync-2.5.6-NEWS -- John **= Email 9 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 14:51:13 -0800 From: Ken Ames Subject: Re: Sent this to the wrong address yesterday...but trol ling for help. .. hi Dave, XWP is at www.xworplace.org and is written by Ulrich Moller as a netlabs project and the cvs is also kept at netlabs. www.netlabs.org Ken Dave Webster wrote: >What is XWP? Link???? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Yuri Dario [mailto:warp at os2power.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:09 AM >To: os2-unix at manninghammills.org >Subject: Re: Sent this to the wrong address yesterday...but >trolling for help. .. > > >Hi Dave, > > > >>So if there are any good PM programmers out there, I could use some >>assistance in getting over this last major hurdle. >> >> > >maybe you can take a look at XWP cvs: Ulrich is rewriting the container >control, superclassing >the default PM behaviour. > >Bye, > > Yuri Dario > >/* > * member of TeamOS/2 - Italy > * http://www.quasarbbs.net/yuri > * http://www.teamos2.it > * http://www.opera.com/os2/ > */ > > > > **= Email 10 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:51:03 +0000 From: John Poltorak Subject: gcc -l Is there an environment variable that can be used with gcc instead of using -lLIB on the gcc command line ? -- John **= Email 11 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:16:43 -0600 From: Dave Webster Subject: RE: Sent this to the wrong address yesterday...but trol What is XWP? Link???? -----Original Message----- From: Yuri Dario [mailto:warp at os2power.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:09 AM To: os2-unix at manninghammills.org Subject: Re: Sent this to the wrong address yesterday...but trolling for help. .. Hi Dave, >So if there are any good PM programmers out there, I could use some >assistance in getting over this last major hurdle. maybe you can take a look at XWP cvs: Ulrich is rewriting the container control, superclassing the default PM behaviour. Bye, Yuri Dario /* * member of TeamOS/2 - Italy * http://www.quasarbbs.net/yuri * http://www.teamos2.it * http://www.opera.com/os2/ */ **= Email 12 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:08:45 +0100 (CET) From: "Yuri Dario" Subject: Re: Sent this to the wrong address yesterday...but trolling for help. .. Hi Dave, >So if there are any good PM programmers out there, I could use some >assistance in getting over this last major hurdle. maybe you can take a look at XWP cvs: Ulrich is rewriting the container control, superclassing the default PM behaviour. Bye, Yuri Dario /* * member of TeamOS/2 - Italy * http://www.quasarbbs.net/yuri * http://www.teamos2.it * http://www.opera.com/os2/ */ **= Email 13 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:17:55 +0100 (CET) From: "Christian Hennecke" Subject: LyX 1.2.3 Has anyone tried to build LyX 1.2.3 on OS/2? The latest available version for OS/2 at OS2ports.com is 1.1.6 fix 4. LyX 1.2.x requires gcc 2.9.x or later and other stuff. This looks quite complex... Christian Hennecke **= Email 14 ==========================** Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:49:31 +0100 From: Thomas Hoffmann Subject: Re: gcc -l This is just for the location of libs: `LIBRARY_PATH' The value of `LIBRARY_PATH' is a colon-separated list of directories, much like `PATH'. When configured as a native compiler, GNU CC tries the directories thus specified when searching for special linker files, if it can't find them using `GCC_EXEC_PREFIX'. Linking using GNU CC also uses these directories when searching for ordinary libraries for the `-l' option (but directories specified with `-L' come first). (from gcc's info file). Ken Ames wrote: > ummm, set LIBRARY_PATH= > > Ken > > > John Poltorak wrote: > >> Is there an environment variable that can be used with gcc instead of >> using -lLIB on the gcc command line ? >> >> >> >> > > >